Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research: where we can use inert instead of aria-hidden in current uses #11057

Open
2 of 5 tasks
driskull opened this issue Dec 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 of 5 tasks
Labels
0 - new New issues that need assignment. a11y Issues related to Accessibility fixes or improvements. bug Bug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug. calcite-components Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package. impact - p3 - not time sensitive User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive needs milestone Planning workflow - pending milestone assignment, has priority and/or estimate. p - medium Issue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the library spike Issues that need quick investigations for time estimations, prioritization, or a quick assessment.

Comments

@driskull
Copy link
Member

Check existing issues

Summary

The inert attribute is a better attribute to use in some cases where aria-hidden is being used. Evaluate where we can switch to inert.

https://web.dev/articles/inert

Actual Behavior

aria-hidden is used in places where inert is more appropriate

Expected Behavior

inert is used where more appropriate

Reproduction Sample

N/A

Reproduction Steps

  1. Search for uses of aria-hidden
  2. evaluate whether inert is more appropriate

Reproduction Version

3.0

Working W3C Example/Tutorial

No response

Relevant Info

No response

Regression?

No response

Priority impact

impact - p3 - not time sensitive

Calcite package

  • @esri/calcite-components
  • @esri/calcite-components-react
  • @esri/calcite-design-tokens
  • @esri/eslint-plugin-calcite-components

Esri team

N/A

@driskull driskull added bug Bug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug. a11y Issues related to Accessibility fixes or improvements. p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality 0 - new New issues that need assignment. needs triage Planning workflow - pending design/dev review. labels Dec 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added calcite-components Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package. impact - p3 - not time sensitive User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive labels Dec 13, 2024
@driskull
Copy link
Member Author

cc @geospatialem

@geospatialem geospatialem added p - medium Issue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the library spike Issues that need quick investigations for time estimations, prioritization, or a quick assessment. needs milestone Planning workflow - pending milestone assignment, has priority and/or estimate. and removed p - high Issue should be addressed in the current milestone, impacts component or core functionality needs triage Planning workflow - pending design/dev review. labels Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0 - new New issues that need assignment. a11y Issues related to Accessibility fixes or improvements. bug Bug reports for broken functionality. Issues should include a reproduction of the bug. calcite-components Issues specific to the @esri/calcite-components package. impact - p3 - not time sensitive User set priority impact status of p3 - not time sensitive needs milestone Planning workflow - pending milestone assignment, has priority and/or estimate. p - medium Issue is non core or affecting less that 60% of people using the library spike Issues that need quick investigations for time estimations, prioritization, or a quick assessment.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants