-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates to the 2025 Accessibility SQL - For Government Sites #3848
Comments
New Brunswick's government uses It's in here: So it should be downloaded, but not in:
gnb.ca isn't included. |
I've also missed Liechtenstein https://www.llv.li There may also be regions here that would be good to check on: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/web-accessibility-monitoring |
Luxembourg has a list of domains from: \b(?:https?://)?(?:www.)?(?:[a-zA-Z0-9-]+.)?(?:public|gov|etat|data|service|security|mfi|lux)(?:.public|.gov|.etat)?.lu\b The US has a federal listing here: France has this list: The UK has: Similar aggregations could be made to pull out more domains. |
Catalunya's got: Basque Government has: Not sure where these would be placed, but likely under Spain. |
Costa Rica go.cr doesn't appear as a country summary, (It is categorized as Other), so this should be updated. |
I don't want to add the PR yet, but do want to capture the changes requested.
https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/blob/main/sql/2024/accessibility/lighthouse_score_by_government.sql
https://github.com/HTTPArchive/almanac.httparchive.org/blob/main/sql/2024/accessibility/lighthouse_score_by_government_with_urls.sql
I was also interested in seeing if it would be possible to somehow consolidate these two queries since most of the guts of the two is the same.
Some UK government institutions to add:
Some state url don't use .gov state.mi.us, state.in.us, state.mn.us, etc.
The .gov scan should be trimmed more as it is catching some mi.gov.br sites in this. I just wasn't able to write a better SQL than this. It is still mostly accurate, but includes some random sites.
Looking at the list of official French list of domains, we could probably extend it to include:
\b(?:www.)?grand[\w-]+.(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?(?:region[\w-]+|[\w-]+region).(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?(?:region[\w-]+|[\w-]+region).(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?departement[\w-].(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?cc-[\w-]+.(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?[\w-]+.agglo.(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?commune(?:-[\w]+).(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?mairie(?:-[\w]+)*.(fr|alsace|bzh)\b
\b(?:www.)?[\w-]+.gouv.(fr|alsace|bzh|app)\b
USA
I will add more below.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: