Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a CI to the repo #17

Closed
rohithasrk opened this issue May 7, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Add a CI to the repo #17

rohithasrk opened this issue May 7, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rohithasrk
Copy link
Contributor

We could use Travis CI, Circle CI or any other CI depending on what is beneficial. Continuous integration is basically used to build the repo and check for errors. Which will play a major role after the tests have been written and make things easier. Just need to add some files which will instruct the CI to do so. #15 needs to be completed as soon as possible.

@dhruvkb
Copy link
Member

dhruvkb commented May 8, 2017

Instead of adding fancy stuff like CI, which are not the need of the hour, we should probably concentrate our efforts on more pressing issues like ensuring compatibility with Python >= 3.5, Django >= 1.10 and closing issues like #9 and #12.

@rohithasrk
Copy link
Contributor Author

rohithasrk commented May 8, 2017

Travis is not something fancy @dhruvkb. It helps us debug things to a great extent which I've come across. Yes. My primary aim is concentrate on more pressing issues like ensuring compatibility. By using a CI software like Travis I'd just have to add a single line in the yml file which throws so many errors and therefore ease the debugging process. This is how things are generally done in big open source organisations and I feel these are some things we'll have to learn. And this issue is about to be closed. So, it is not something that would really take time. :-)

@kkpatel1
Copy link
Member

#18 Added Travis CI. Let's see what can we do with that. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants