Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider unifying this repo with upstream #162

Open
mattip opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Consider unifying this repo with upstream #162

mattip opened this issue Aug 30, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@mattip
Copy link

mattip commented Aug 30, 2024

Since the migration to cibuildwheel, it would seem this repo could be merged with the upstream statsmodels. That would get more eyes on the wheel building, and would make it easier to manage things like the API secret by the project maintainers. Is there a reason to keep it separate here?

@bashtage
Copy link
Contributor

We should probably just migrate it to the statsmodels org as a speerate repo. I agree there isn't much of a case to continue to use this org.

@agriyakhetarpal
Copy link
Contributor

I fully agree with this, it took me a short while yesterday to find out where statsmodels was publishing its nightly wheels from! This repository is hidden in the nooks and crannies of a separate organisation :)

@josef-pkt
Copy link

numpy, scipy and pandas have already moved.

So, I don't see a reason to move statsmodels builds also.

@bashtage
How should we do this?
for example
https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository#transferring-a-repository-owned-by-your-organization
or just forking, or creating a separate repo

AFAIU, you have permission on both organizations to make a transfer.

@agriyakhetarpal
Copy link
Contributor

It could also be moved and maintained as a standalone workflow in the main statsmodels repository, which would avoid the need for updating the submodule before building.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants