-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add streaming quality 1080p and higher #508
Comments
Any input? |
I feel like this is more a limitation of Discord, and tinkering with it is bypassing it, which I'm not sure if I'm okay with to implement within my client (after all, the goal for it is to behave just as regular client/browser from Discord's perspective). |
Alright, well it's up to you the developer ofcourse. Sometimes i need to share my screen or see the screen of some colleagues to explain them things, this is difficult when the resolution is only 720p 30fps and devinitely feels lower than that, hard to read text, etc. After everything i said it must be obvious that discord is an evil scum company not doing anything good. I see nothing wrong with webcord offering decent streaming quality. Discord is evil scum i see absolutely nothing wrong with doing whatever the bleep you want. |
@NolonQ For some time (much before Nitro got so much intrusive and Discord got the entire UI redesign) I had plans not to implement any Nitro features, the goal was not to exploit on Discord with a hope that in exchange Discord will remain neutral to WebCord and to avoid any kind of detection that users using my client are doing stuff otherwise prohibied. But honestly with all they made fo Discord to be more intrusive with their Nitro popups and focusing more at making free users experience worse than before, I'm kinda in doubt when it comes to keep my client neutral in terms like that. As of the streaming however, it's not just the morality I'm aware of, but Discord doing a server-side checks for a stream quality in order to determine if it is higher than it should be. It's not something complex to do (I'm pretty sure this can be just implemented by parsing the metadata, there's most likely no need to decode a stream) and could put in a danger the people who are using mods like that. Another thing is that… I still don't know where Discord does limit the stream quality for browsers, I guess I could dig if it is doing it with the constrains and override them but again, I'm still unsure about implementing it since that's a bit against the policy of the WebCord as an app – the goal still is to either be ToS compilant or at least behave in way that it could be hard for Discord to distinguish WebCord from a legitimate clients or browsers if they planned to fight against the mods. I want from users to feel safe using my client, at least much safer than using most client mods. So again, if I'll plan to implement it, it'll probably won't be the default setting and the users will have sone warning not to toggle it if they are not aware of the risks. |
@SpacingBat3 It's good to know your thoughts about discord. I don't know to many discord forks, only bettercord, vesktop/vencord and webcord from all these i chose to stick with webcord because indeed it gives atleast in my opinion to most secure and private useage feeling. I know that violating discord ToS can get your account banned, from my personal experience this is not important because the actual ban rates on people using discord forks is low, i've seen many fork users and none of whom i spoke to has ever been banned, me included. So what if the worst case scenario comes true and my account really is terminated? |
is it possible to get aleast 60 fps streaming ? |
Description
Vencord-Vesktop allows users to stream with more than the default 720p 30fps.
It enables streaming with native screen resolution and 60fps.
Was this ever considered for webcord? streaming in 1080p 60fps would be really nice.
Suggestions
No response
Alternatives
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: