Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

request for clarification on Hivenet and cmac IPs for U250 #1

Open
yswntht opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

request for clarification on Hivenet and cmac IPs for U250 #1

yswntht opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@yswntht
Copy link

yswntht commented Jul 23, 2024

Hi

As pointed in the README for RDMA-based connections, I was referring to AlveoLink. Their default target for Hivenet and cmac packages (.xo files) is U55c card. I see in few of the examples of TAPA-CS, U250 is considered. For example: ( line9: --part-num xcu250-figd2104-2L-e) in file apps/multi-fpga-vadd/run_tapa.sh.

Should Hivenet and cmac .xo files be regenerated for U250? or can the same U55c .xo files be used for U250 as well? can you please clarify on this.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant