HybridSPAdes - different graph outputs #909
-
Hello!
Thank you very much, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 7 comments 9 replies
-
Hello
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There are certainly lots of packages that enables use of GFA from Python including e.g. https://github.com/ggonnella/gfapy The list at https://github.com/GFA-spec/GFA-spec might certainly help These are the same graphs. For mapping long reads to graph we'd suggest using more user-oriented tools like SPAligner. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi again Anton (or anyone else that can help),
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sure. Also note that there are self reverse-complementary edges (the ones that are complementary to themselves) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you very much Anton! Now that I understand that assembly_graph_with_scaffolds.gfa and assembly_graph_after_simplification.gfa are the same graph except for the addition of scaffolds - why does the first has 45593 segments and the second has 67901? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Of course! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @nettanetta @asl (or anyone else). Did you ever work out whether HybridSpades outputs an assembly graph after the long-reads have been used? I have some assemblies from a sequencing centre and want to see whether two contigs are separate or attached (I think one might be a plasmid/phage), but the assembly graphs have many many more contigs than the final contig.fasta. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
There are certainly lots of packages that enables use of GFA from Python including e.g. https://github.com/ggonnella/gfapy The list at https://github.com/GFA-spec/GFA-spec might certainly help
These are the same graphs.
For mapping long reads to graph we'd suggest using more user-oriented tools like SPAligner.