You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Optional is used in some of the Recipes APIs. It also used internally. This results in slightly larger serialized data. We could drop the use of Optional internally in classes private instance var. For example DifferenceExport.java line 49 uses Optional internally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is this still valid? The only place I see Optional being used as a field is in org.apache.fluo.recipes.core.combine.ChangeImpl and org.apache.fluo.recipes.core.map.Update.
I think its stilll valid in that it would reduce data size. However looking at this now I am wondering what the impact on currently persisted data would be and how to mitigate any negative consequences.
Optional is used in some of the Recipes APIs. It also used internally. This results in slightly larger serialized data. We could drop the use of Optional internally in classes private instance var. For example DifferenceExport.java line 49 uses Optional internally.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: