Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Add OpenCypher Support to Neptune Connector #2118

Open
mhavey opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[FEATURE] Add OpenCypher Support to Neptune Connector #2118

mhavey opened this issue Jul 25, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@mhavey
Copy link
Contributor

mhavey commented Jul 25, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? If yes, please describe.
Current Neptune connector does not allow me to make OpenCypher custom or passthrough queries. Additionally, current connector does not support Neptune Analytics, which currently supports only OpenCypher as query language.

Describe the solution you'd like
Neptune connector currently supports RDF and Property graph types. Property graph uses Gremlin to talk to Neptune. Neptune supports both Gremlin and OpenCypher. Add support in Connector for OpenCypher. Furthermore, allow connector to be configured to use either Neptune database or Neptune Analytics. Add graph-identifier parameter for connectivity to NA.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Gremlin is an alternative on Neptune database, not Neptune Analytics

Additional context
In addition to basic node/edge table support, passthrough support is also desired.

@mhavey mhavey added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 25, 2024
@macohen
Copy link
Contributor

macohen commented Jul 30, 2024

@mhavey are you willing to work on this? Are you able to post any error message you see when executing a passthrough query with OpenCypher?

cc:@AbdulR3hman

@mhavey
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhavey commented Aug 1, 2024

Yes, will discuss with Neptune dev team.

@fatima-kscope
Copy link

@mhavey is this feature being taken up?

@mhavey
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhavey commented Oct 23, 2024

I discussed with the dev team. It is a good feature, but it is not highest priority currently. I recommend keeping open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants