Support default field values #5839
Labels
A-derive
Area: #[derive]` macro API
C-enhancement
Category: Raise on the bar on expectations
E-medium
Call for participation: Experience needed to fix: Medium / intermediate
Default field values would provide an alternative to
default_value_t
From the RFC (why is an RFC in 2024 using structopt?)
default_value_t
should have higher precedenceOpen questions
nightly
feature?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: