Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supports placeholder in request header and body #55

Closed
quaff opened this issue Feb 26, 2020 · 11 comments
Closed

Supports placeholder in request header and body #55

quaff opened this issue Feb 26, 2020 · 11 comments

Comments

@quaff
Copy link

quaff commented Feb 26, 2020

To simulate different user and payload base on external file.

@codesenberg codesenberg self-assigned this Mar 1, 2020
@codesenberg codesenberg added this to the Unplanned milestone Mar 1, 2020
@codesenberg
Copy link
Owner

This is a nice feature indeed and somewhat similar to #5.
Unfortunately, as of now, I don't have the time required to implement it.

@quaff
Copy link
Author

quaff commented Mar 1, 2020

External file could be static csv file, or script file to dynamic generate values.

@codesenberg
Copy link
Owner

You mean like a script written in Bash, Lua or some other language?

@quaff
Copy link
Author

quaff commented Mar 2, 2020

No bash, Lua or JS.

@quaff
Copy link
Author

quaff commented Mar 2, 2020

A much simple way is reading bodies from file which delimited by blank line or some other rule, then send in round-robin mode, reuse the -f and -n arguments.

@codesenberg
Copy link
Owner

Ok, got you. I'll consider this feature for v2. No hard promises or ETAs though.

@quaff
Copy link
Author

quaff commented Mar 3, 2020

You should consider headers per body.

@codesenberg
Copy link
Owner

codesenberg commented Oct 4, 2020

Unfortunately, I don't have time to implement features these days, but maybe I'll get back to this in some quite distant future. Closed till then.

@fuxinhao-crypto
Copy link

sorry, is there any progress?

@gabrielgrijincu
Copy link

This would be really helpful. Any news on the progress/ availability?

@codesenberg
Copy link
Owner

Hi all. Not sure why you keep posting to a closed issue.
There's #84 now, which is open. The feature is not planned and there's no point in asking for progress updates as nobody (to the best of my knowledge) is working on it.

Repository owner locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants