Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting results by date added (and other, and reverse) #18

Open
quite opened this issue Nov 25, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Sorting results by date added (and other, and reverse) #18

quite opened this issue Nov 25, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@quite
Copy link

quite commented Nov 25, 2014

Is this the place for that, or should it be done in the main program?

@quite quite changed the title Storting results by säte (and other) Storting results by date added (and other, and reverse) Nov 25, 2014
@quite quite changed the title Storting results by date added (and other, and reverse) Sorting results by date added (and other, and reverse) Nov 25, 2014
@erickok
Copy link
Owner

erickok commented Nov 25, 2014

You are right here. The problem is that a lot of search process won't support this. Of course you could sort the results that ARE loaded (which would be the responsibility of the consuming app, not this search module) but those wouldn't represent the actual results as you'd want them.

I'll leave this open though as I agree with the use case and perhaps we could implement this for some of the supported sites.

@DavidHemsley
Copy link

I've found that if I remove the sorting lines, my results are newest at the top (which is good for me). I also changed s=4 to s=3 (TorrentDay) and sorted by size (not useful to me, but it worked), but as Eric states, each site will work differently. For me, I've made a copy of TD and added c7=1 and removed the sorting which returns newest HD TV torrents. If only I knew a little about coding it might be of use to others! Good work Eric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants