You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since STP is not part of Faucet, if lacp/LAG is not in use, an externally broadcast packet (e.g. ARP) on a loop_protect_external port might be looped back in through another loop_protect_external port, which then gets broadcast back out the originating port. This results in the sending device receiving a reflected copy of its own broadcast packet, which would be bad.
Brad and I discussed this, and the thought was to make incoming packets on a loop_protect_external port dropped (make port down) on any non-root switch. So, only the stacking root would receive packets.
This was originally mentioned as part of #3285 but we decided that solution was a "bad idea" and this would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since STP is not part of Faucet, if lacp/LAG is not in use, an externally broadcast packet (e.g. ARP) on a loop_protect_external port might be looped back in through another loop_protect_external port, which then gets broadcast back out the originating port. This results in the sending device receiving a reflected copy of its own broadcast packet, which would be bad.
Brad and I discussed this, and the thought was to make incoming packets on a loop_protect_external port dropped (make port down) on any non-root switch. So, only the stacking root would receive packets.
This was originally mentioned as part of #3285 but we decided that solution was a "bad idea" and this would be better.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: