Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ruff to instead a black formateer #721

Open
6 tasks done
Anammkh opened this issue Dec 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
6 tasks done

add ruff to instead a black formateer #721

Anammkh opened this issue Dec 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Anammkh
Copy link

Anammkh commented Dec 8, 2024

Self Checks

  • I have thoroughly reviewed the project documentation (installation, training, inference) but couldn't find any relevant information that meets my needs. English 中文 日本語 Portuguese (Brazil)
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell us your story.

ruff is best formatter and lint python for now, i think better to use ruff

2. What is your suggested solution?

using ruff for lint and formatter

3. Additional context or comments

this is documentation for ruff
![image] (https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1309177/232603514-c95e9b0f-6b31-43de-9a80-9e844173fd6a.svg)

4. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
@Anammkh Anammkh added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 8, 2024
@Anammkh Anammkh mentioned this issue Dec 8, 2024
@PoTaTo-Mika
Copy link
Collaborator

pr welcome

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants