Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 6, 2023. It is now read-only.

Adding the Support for the new floodlight from Reolink #599

Open
MiAutomations opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

Adding the Support for the new floodlight from Reolink #599

MiAutomations opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@MiAutomations
Copy link

MiAutomations commented Dec 5, 2022

Hello Team

It's possible in a future release adding the new devices floodlight to this integration?

image

Thank you and best regards

@ptyers
Copy link
Contributor

ptyers commented Dec 6, 2022

Should be possible. Need all available specifications and your willingness to act as a test bed. For some while I have been considering polishing the integration with regard to camera floodlight control. And to cater for situation (eg 510) where Reolink erroneously reports capability that does not exist.

@MiAutomations
Copy link
Author

Should be possible. Need all available specifications and your willingness to act as a test bed. For some while I have been considering polishing the integration with regard to camera floodlight control. And to cater for situation (eg 510) where Reolink erroneously reports capability that does not exist.

Great thank you for your interest in this.

Yes, I'm available to test, I have one POE floodlight.

Regarding the info, what You need? I'm not an expert but I'm available to help you.

By the way I found this API manual that is mentioning floodlight control, don't know if can help or not ...

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15AFMQSMlMdpjL2USPsvYd-J9xWecrEf9/view

Thank you and best regards

@ptyers
Copy link
Contributor

ptyers commented Dec 7, 2022 via email

@MiAutomations
Copy link
Author

May be a while before I can get back into looking at the code, christmas will delay things. Will send you a couple of curl commands to extract information from the unit that I need in the next week or so.On 7 Dec 2022 21:07, MiAutomations @.> wrote: Should be possible. Need all available specifications and your willingness to act as a test bed. For some while I have been considering polishing the integration with regard to camera floodlight control. And to cater for situation (eg 510) where Reolink erroneously reports capability that does not exist. Great thank you for your interest in this. Yes, I'm available to test, I have one POE floodlight. Regarding the info, what You need? I'm not an expert but I'm available to help you. By the way I found this API manual that is mentioning floodlight control, don't know if can help or not ... https://drive.google.com/file/d/15AFMQSMlMdpjL2USPsvYd-J9xWecrEf9/view Thank you and best regards —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.>

Ok No problem I understand. I will wait

Thank you

@ptyers
Copy link
Contributor

ptyers commented Dec 10, 2022 via email

@kevin-david
Copy link

kevin-david commented Dec 10, 2022

I have this floodlight. Would love support for this also, but I don't think these floodlights have an HTTP server running so it's nontrivial. There also doesn't seem to be an option to enable it, at least not yet...

image

What is available: they use the "Baichuan" protocol available on the device on port 9000. I started reverse engineering that a bit here and made some progress: thirtythreeforty/neolink#324

Doesn't look like this addon supports that protocol, and I've been considering how to handle that... a few options

  • MQTT support in neolink and integrating it that way - @QuantumEntangledAndy started work on that here: https://github.com/QuantumEntangledAndy/neolink. Would require another addon in HASS
  • Adding Baichuan support to this integration
  • Something else entirely, via AppDaemon or NetDaemon
  • Contact Reolink and ask them to add the HTTP API to the camera (I just did this, but have low expectations)

@sk1ll10
Copy link

sk1ll10 commented Dec 12, 2022

I also have a floodlight here. Atm any control aside the official apps would be enough for me. As far as i am following your work you were not able to make any change on the floodlight correct? Or did you manage to turn of the status LED?

Do you know this -> https://github.com/jdillenkofer/camera_proxy/blob/af9a170d3a8db831318a1aafcb2bf097ab62fd40/src/baichuan_control_layer.py (also mentiones neolink in readme)

If i would not have found your work i would have started poking around with that thing but i just started, so i most likely miss a lot of obvious stuff.

@MiAutomations
Copy link
Author

May be a while before I can get back into looking at the code, christmas will delay things. Will send you a couple of curl commands to extract information from the unit that I need in the next week or so.On 7 Dec 2022 21:07, MiAutomations @.> wrote: Should be possible. Need all available specifications and your willingness to act as a test bed. For some while I have been considering polishing the integration with regard to camera floodlight control. And to cater for situation (eg 510) where Reolink erroneously reports capability that does not exist. Great thank you for your interest in this. Yes, I'm available to test, I have one POE floodlight. Regarding the info, what You need? I'm not an expert but I'm available to help you. By the way I found this API manual that is mentioning floodlight control, don't know if can help or not ... https://drive.google.com/file/d/15AFMQSMlMdpjL2USPsvYd-J9xWecrEf9/view Thank you and best regards —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.>

Hello @ptyers

Have you any news about this subject?

Thank you in advance for you support

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants