Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we have the option to load image non-virtually? #110

Open
hinerm opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Should we have the option to load image non-virtually? #110

hinerm opened this issue Jul 12, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@hinerm
Copy link
Member

hinerm commented Jul 12, 2022

Currently we always force CELL mode when opening images. We should consider providing users an option to load whole images in one pass, i.e. in the import command.

@hinerm
Copy link
Member Author

hinerm commented Jul 12, 2022

@ctrueden was there a design reason we would always want to open images as CELL?

Also, I experimented opening images in ARRAY mode and still got back a virtual image in ImageJ.. what's the current mechanism for getting a non-virtual image when opening datasets in Fiji?

@imagesc-bot
Copy link

This issue has been mentioned on Image.sc Forum. There might be relevant details there:

https://forum.image.sc/t/imagej-omero-5-5-5-6-update-site-ready-for-testing/69394/4

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member

was there a design reason we would always want to open images as CELL?

It just seemed simpler. If it's small and you want it all loaded into local memory, just duplicate it.

Ideally, even apart from OMERO, I'd love if ImageJ2 always opened images as cell, and if you want something else, you make a copy.

@ctrueden
Copy link
Member

what's the current mechanism for getting a non-virtual image when opening datasets in Fiji?

There might not be one. An ImageJ2 image is fundamentally not an ImagePlus object. I believe when @maarzt improved the imglib2-ij layer, we opted for always virtual, because ultimately the ImageProcessor is backed by an ImgLib2 data structure.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants