-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 893
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Kubeflow Platform (Manifests & Security WG) roadmap for KF 1.10 #2763
Comments
(Orthogonal question, but why is this called Especially once we'll have the repos broken up after the discussion in kubeflow/kubeflow#7549 (comment) |
Similar to what @kimwnasptd said, it's hard to imagine that "Kubeflow Platform" should not also involve the distribution owners? I am not sure we should be calling the meetings "Kubeflow Platform" if they are only referring to Manifests/Security WGs. |
@kimwnasptd The main motivation is to identify contributors who can maintain Kubeflow Platform components. E.g. Kubeflow Manifests, Profile Controller, KFAM, Central Dashboard, etc. So if users have any questions about these components they can join the Kubeflow Platform community calls. From my perspective, distributions should certainly join those meetings since they are main consumers of Kubeflow Manifests. |
@kimwnasptd it is in line with kubeflow/community#725 (comment) |
Describe your issue
Tracker for 1.10 @rimolive @kimwnasptd
Follow up of #2598 and #2592
We are looking for volunteers and I already mentored over 20 people, so please reach out if you want to help.
Organizational:
documentation:
chore:
--server-side --force-conflicts
since CRDs became too big in Kserve 0.14.0Security external:
Performance / Denial of service:
Security JWTs:
Rootless Kubeflow & Istio:
manifests/.github/workflows/pss_test.yaml
Lines 35 to 45 in 26d970d
Rest:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: