-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added ability to respect the kubebuilder maxlimit #134
Conversation
Signed-off-by: swastik959 <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: swastik959 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @swastik959! |
Hi @swastik959. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
hi @levikobi I have tried to create a pr for the feedback if this is what was meant from the issue ? |
/cc @levikobi |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @swastik959! Thank you for taking on this one.
The maxlimit constant isn't provider-specific limitation. We either need to add this as a common validation to each provider, or (a better approach IMO) check that after the translation already occurred.
Also, please avoid the use of panic.
@swastik959 Do you still work on this? Let us know if we can help you to move this forward |
I am going to close the PR un-assign this now, so others can pick it up. Feel free to reply if you still want to work on this. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
adds the ability to limit of objects to respect the kubebuilder max count
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #124
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: