-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support Gateway API extensions (output providers) #125
Comments
Hi @arkodg , thanks for creating this issue! It looks reasonable to me 👍 |
cool, I think |
Thanks @arkodg. Also I did not fully understand what |
@LiorLieberman here's an example for Istio Input
Output
|
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
I think this use case can be addressed by #78, but only when reading from files. With it, it will be possible to output all the input resources that do not belong to the set of converted resources. When it comes to reading resources from a cluster, that flag cannot be used as it is now in the PR. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/reopen |
@LiorLieberman: Reopened this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/assign @sawsa307 |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
@sawsa307 as discussed before, support for input and output providers is necessary to close this issue. |
Yes I think #188 merge automatically triggered this since it said |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
What would you like to be added:
Add the ability to translate
provider
specific APIs into implementation specific Gateway API extensions (output providers) for fields not currently supported in the Gateway APIWhy this is needed:
Adding ability to translate all input provider specific intent without losing any functionality
For e.g. the current ingress-nginx translation only translates a subset of the API (annotations) https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx/user-guide/nginx-configuration/annotations/#annotations
Without this feature, its unlikely that the user will migrate to Gateway API until all the input provider features are supported in the Gateway API APIs
If this tool supports the notion of output providers, the input API could be translated to various implementation specific Gateway API extensions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: