-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tide re-ran an overridden job #238
Comments
There are opinions on this, it's not entirely clear. Tide retests jobs when HEAD of the target branch moves since the job executed, because target branch change means the job results before that are essentially obsolete (ran on different code than would be the result of the merge now). Now, when people override, they do it for two reasons:
I'm not saying we should do nothing, but accommodating use case 1 too much incentives repos to have broken jobs and not fix them or disable them? Or maybe we need to distinguish a sticky override and normal one. I'm not sure. |
Those are fair points, and if the HEAD of the target branch changed, I agree it does seem it would make sense for Tide to retry the job before merging the PR. Would it make a difference if the job it re-ran is a required job that's set to |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
We have a job I overrode when I submitted the PR but then it took a while for it to get approved. Once it finally did get approved, Tide ran the overridden job, which it shouldn't have done.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: