[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign chanieljdan for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

✅ Pull request preview available for checking

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	5040444
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-io-main-staging/deploys/67645e518d47900008cd2039
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-49109--kubernetes-io-main-staging.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

There is a similar change needed a few lines down, for the sandbox image configuration.

https://github.com/kubernetes/website/blob/000382cc16effe1416202882dc39ae4dc0aea35a/content/en/docs/setup/production-environment/container-runtimes.md#overriding-the-sandbox-pause-image-override-pause-image-containerd

[plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri"]
  sandbox_image = "registry.k8s.io/pause:3.2"

Not sure you want to repeat the "version" for each snippet though, or about the indentation?

There is a similar change needed a few lines down, for the sandbox image configuration.

https://github.com/kubernetes/website/blob/000382cc16effe1416202882dc39ae4dc0aea35a/content/en/docs/setup/production-environment/container-runtimes.md#overriding-the-sandbox-pause-image-override-pause-image-containerd

[plugins."io.containerd.grpc.v1.cri"]
  sandbox_image = "registry.k8s.io/pause:3.2"

Not sure you want to repeat the "version" for each snippet though, or about the indentation?

Good catch!
I modified both these places.

Did you see the question about updating the example to the current pause image version? It can be handled as a separate issue, since it affects all runtimes (not only containerd)

#48976 (comment)

Did you see the question about updating the example to the current pause image version? It can be handled as a separate issue, since it affects all runtimes (not only containerd)

#48976 (comment)

Hi, @afbjorklund ,
I am sorry that I miss the comment before.

Now I correct the docker image version from 3.2 to 3.6.
FYI.

Is it feasible to use tabs here?

We prefer tabs when readers have a choice.

Hi, @sftim ,

Thanks for your advice.
I've corrected these two places into tabs.

Now I correct the docker image version from 3.2 to 3.6.

It was supposed to be 3.10

Better to do it properly in a separate PR, perhaps

Since it affects more than just containerd

So you can leave it out in this commit for v2 / v3...

3.2

sure.

I correct these two back to origin 3.2.