Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Index error pop from empty list #3

Open
Kali95739 opened this issue Apr 4, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Index error pop from empty list #3

Kali95739 opened this issue Apr 4, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@Kali95739
Copy link

Can u make sure its not me Im getting index error pop from empty list

@manuelz120
Copy link
Owner

Hi, can you share some more details? Which version of SuiteCRM are you testing against?

And where does the index error occur? In this line?

https://github.com/manuelz120/CVE-2022-23940/blob/main/exploit.py#L80

@Kali95739
Copy link
Author

Kali95739 commented Apr 4, 2022

I had a list of public suitecrm, not exactly sure on the version. If u have a way that I can get that lmk I will check and yes, I believe that line. Most of the ones it logged into have given the same response about the index error

@Kali95739
Copy link
Author

If not all the ones it logged into hard to be exactly sure

@Kali95739
Copy link
Author

Python version is python 3.8.10

@manuelz120
Copy link
Owner

Regarding the SCRM Version: You can find it out on the About-Page (e.g. http://localhost/index.php?module=Home&action=About).

image

I just reconfirmed that the exploit is working on version 8.0.3 and 7.12.4. You can try the same on your local machine by running the exploit against the vulnerable docker image included in this repo.

If you still run into errors, it would be great if you could provide the affected version and the output of response.text (content of the HTTP response).

@manuelz120
Copy link
Owner

I had a list of public suitecrm, not exactly sure on the version.

Just to be clear, runnings exploits against publicly available SuiteCRM versions without consent of the owner might be illegal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants