We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check that pk have real names and not system defines names :
instead of sys_c0012237 it should be a custom name that tells more about objects.
it also means that the dev/dba have properly reviewed pk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
http://www.vertabelo.com/blog/technical-articles/naming-conventions-in-database-modeling
Sorry, something went wrong.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6695079/what-is-the-naming-convention-for-primary-key-column
I've just discovered that : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_11179
https://launchbylunch.com/posts/2014/Feb/16/sql-naming-conventions/
No branches or pull requests
Check that pk have real names and not system defines names :
instead of sys_c0012237 it should be a custom name that tells more about objects.
it also means that the dev/dba have properly reviewed pk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: