You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Both Top-1 and Top-5 accuracies of three distinct models are being improved uniformely with respect to the baseline accuracies after the introduction of the swish activation and SE modules:
AtomNAS-A:74.6->76.3 (+1.7), 92.1->93.0 (+0.9)
AtomNAS-B:75.5->77.2 (+1.7), 92.6->93.5 (+0.9)
AtomNAS-C:75.9->77.6 (+1.7), 92.7->93.6 (+0.9)
which is an eye-catching uniformity that rarely appears. Is there a reasonable explaination for this?
Thanks very much for your reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Both Top-1 and Top-5 accuracies of three distinct models are being improved uniformely with respect to the baseline accuracies after the introduction of the swish activation and SE modules:
AtomNAS-A:74.6->76.3 (+1.7), 92.1->93.0 (+0.9)
AtomNAS-B:75.5->77.2 (+1.7), 92.6->93.5 (+0.9)
AtomNAS-C:75.9->77.6 (+1.7), 92.7->93.6 (+0.9)
which is an eye-catching uniformity that rarely appears. Is there a reasonable explaination for this?
Thanks very much for your reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: