You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could you add round brackets to the characters that are allowed to be before the @ of a citation?
I'm not quite sure why round brackets wouldn't be allowed to be in front of @.
If there is any reason I would be happy to know!
It's a great extansion otherwise!
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good question. I actually don't remember exactly why I excluded round brackets, but I think it was to avoid accidentally writing (@smith) instead of [@smith].
Pandoc's citeproc should format the citation and insert round brackets if necessary. So if you want the final document to look something like This is a proven fact. (Smith (1994)), then it's better to use ... fact. [@smith94] instead of ... fact. (@smith94).
Although both versions might give the same output by default, only the square bracket version will be formatted correctly if a different csl file is used.
I guess if you wanted to add an in-line citation as the first thing inside a round bracket, so something like This is a fact (Smith (1994) proved it), then the extension wouldn't show the suggestions.
Anyways, if you think allowing round brackets will be useful, then I can enable them.
Could you add round brackets to the characters that are allowed to be before the @ of a citation?
I'm not quite sure why round brackets wouldn't be allowed to be in front of @.
If there is any reason I would be happy to know!
It's a great extansion otherwise!
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: