We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The parsing of an application failed (sdk v2), because the format of the "created" field of a JWK is not the expected one.
This code is supposed to succeed:
var app okta.App app = okta.NewOpenIdConnectApplication() app, _, err := a.sdk.Application.GetApplication(ctx, appID, app, nil)
This code fails for one specific app with the error:
"parsing time \"2023-07-17 11:28:57 +0000 UTC\" as \"2006-01-02T15:04:05Z07:00\": cannot parse \" 11:28:57 +0000 UTC\" as \"T\""
After investigation, this is the part which is wrongly formatted:
"jwks": { "keys": [ { "created": "2023-07-17 11:28:57 +0000 UTC", } ] }
It's specific to the app which fails
No response
1.22.1
github.com/okta/okta-sdk-golang/v2 v2.20.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been marked stale because there has been no activity within the last 14 days. To keep this issue active, remove the stale label.
stale
Sorry, something went wrong.
Can you reproduced this in the latest version of the sdk? V4.1.0?
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug?
The parsing of an application failed (sdk v2), because the format of the "created" field of a JWK is not the expected one.
What is expected to happen?
This code is supposed to succeed:
What is the actual behavior?
This code fails for one specific app with the error:
After investigation, this is the part which is wrongly formatted:
Reproduction Steps?
It's specific to the app which fails
Additional Information?
No response
Golang Version
1.22.1
SDK Version
OS version
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: