Update OCI charter to deal with project structure issue

[caniszczyk]

See this thread:
https://groups.google.com/a/opencontainers.org/forum/#!topic/tob/1pgiEffnu0M

[caniszczyk]

@opencontainers/tdc-maintainers it would be great to get any proposed solutions to this issue from the TDC. I believe the original intention was to have 1 TDC maintainer list and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple OCI projects with their respective TDC maintainers. We can move forward by updating the charter to reflect that including deciding whether each project should a) their own list of maintainers, or b) one list of maintainers across all OCI projects. We can modify the charter if need be to accommodate option a) if that is what is preferred, but b) is supported by default right now.

[philips]

Agree on clarifying the governance to make option B clear (status quo)

[wking]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:34:26AM -0800, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:

I believe the original intention was to have 1 TDC maintainer list
and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple OCI projects with
their respective TDC maintainers.

That's what the draft charter looked like, but the adopted charter
moved somewhat towards multiple TDCs. The public discussion around
that shift is in [1,2] if folks want some background reading.

 Subject: Contribute to OCI
 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:20:04 +0800
 Message-ID: <CAHKD89TqBQvbcdvwt-g3J--sDyq=P50qi6CytokNJznVsei7YQ@mail.gmail.com>

[diogomonica]

"1 TDC maintainer list and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple OCI projects with their respective TDC maintainers." seems like the right thing, but I'm still not sold on the need for a separate project when what we've been discussing here (distributable format) is already on the roadmap for the current project.

[wking]

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:04:08AM -0800, Diogo Mónica wrote:

"1 TDC maintainer list and multiple OCI projects instead of multiple
OCI projects with their respective TDC maintainers." seems like the
right thing.

The initial push for multiple TDCs was so there could be a distinction
between runC maintainers and spec maintainers 1. As long as:

• the membership, rules, and contact information of each set (TOB
  electors, TDC(s), project maintainers, …) is clear, and
• specification/testing projects are governed independently of a
  particular implementation.

I'll be happy.

 Subject: Re: Contribute to OCI
 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:43:17 -0700
 Message-ID: <[email protected]>