You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be interesting to change the calculation method performed in the "FrequencyResponseResult" class; it is possible to optimize it and obtain accurate results more quickly.
The calculation performed in "transfer_matrix" can be done using the rotor matrices directly, as shown below. There's no need to perform the integrations currently employed, which take more time to generate results.
Considering cases where many simultaneous simulations are required, such as uncertainty propagation, for example, any faster result generation is important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be interesting to change the calculation method performed in the "FrequencyResponseResult" class; it is possible to optimize it and obtain accurate results more quickly.
The calculation performed in "transfer_matrix" can be done using the rotor matrices directly, as shown below. There's no need to perform the integrations currently employed, which take more time to generate results.
Considering cases where many simultaneous simulations are required, such as uncertainty propagation, for example, any faster result generation is important.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: