-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI Build for Android discontinued? #5
Comments
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 26, 2017
…ttps://codereview.webrtc.org/2838873002/ ) Reason for revert: Causes build problem: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.webrtc/builders/iOS64%20Sim%20Debug%20%28iOS%209.0%29/builds/1630/steps/generate%20build%20files%20%28mb%29/logs/stdio Original issue's description: > Creating webrtc/modules:module_api > > This target keeps track of .h the files under webrtc/modules/include/ > that are not part of any target. > If a .h file is not part of a target the 'gn check' utility is not > able to spot if a target is missing a dependency because even if > it parses '#include' directives it is not able to find a target that > contains these headers. > > BUG=webrtc:7513 > NOTRY=True > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2838873002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17880} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/5a1a092ed09ca92719eeb293275f64c0cdcc0e51 [email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=webrtc:7513 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2839963005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17881}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 26, 2017
…ps://codereview.webrtc.org/2839963005/ ) Reason for revert: Fixing the Gn error and try to reland. Original issue's description: > Revert of Creating webrtc/modules:module_api (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2838873002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Causes build problem: https://build.chromium.org/p/client.webrtc/builders/iOS64%20Sim%20Debug%20%28iOS%209.0%29/builds/1630/steps/generate%20build%20files%20%28mb%29/logs/stdio > > Original issue's description: > > Creating webrtc/modules:module_api > > > > This target keeps track of .h the files under webrtc/modules/include/ > > that are not part of any target. > > If a .h file is not part of a target the 'gn check' utility is not > > able to spot if a target is missing a dependency because even if > > it parses '#include' directives it is not able to find a target that > > contains these headers. > > > > BUG=webrtc:7513 > > NOTRY=True > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2838873002 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17880} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/5a1a092ed09ca92719eeb293275f64c0cdcc0e51 > > [email protected] > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=webrtc:7513 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2839963005 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17881} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/bb08c3e29656fafe8a2d5d16ec4a62db49689f8a [email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true [email protected] BUG=webrtc:7513 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2843913002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17884}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2017
…on. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2833773003/ ) Reason for revert: Breaks external bot Original issue's description: > Support adding and removing MediaRecorder to camera 2 session. > > Camera 1 API is not supported. > > BUG=b/36684011 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2833773003 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17901} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/2fc04769faec0031a202963eaeb602420a082c07 [email protected],[email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=b/36684011 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2844233002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17905}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 27, 2017
…on. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2844233002/ ) Reason for revert: Revert "Revert of Support adding and removing MediaRecorder to camera 2 session. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2833773003/ )" Will fix external bots by cherry picking this CL and updating external functions which depend on CameraVideoCapturer interface Original issue's description: > Revert of Support adding and removing MediaRecorder to camera 2 session. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2833773003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Breaks external bot > > Original issue's description: > > Support adding and removing MediaRecorder to camera 2 session. > > > > Camera 1 API is not supported. > > > > BUG=b/36684011 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2833773003 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17901} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/2fc04769faec0031a202963eaeb602420a082c07 > > [email protected],[email protected] > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=b/36684011 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2844233002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17905} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/6702739862e292f3556a9e63c71367f49c3895b4 [email protected],[email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=b/36684011 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2844393002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#17915}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 5, 2017
…ErrorCorrection. (patchset #5 id:120001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2893293003/ ) Reason for revert: Breaks fuzzer. Original issue's description: > Only compare sequence numbers from the same SSRC in ForwardErrorCorrection. > > Prior to this CL, the ForwardErrorCorrection state would be reset whenever > the difference in sequence numbers of the last recovered media packet > and the new packet (media or FEC) was too large. This comparison did not > take into account that FlexFEC uses a different SSRC for the FEC packets, > meaning that the the state would be reset very frequently when FlexFEC > is used. This should not have led to any major problems, except for a > decreased decoding efficiency. > > This CL verifies that whenever we compare sequence numbers in > ForwardErrorCorrection, they do indeed belong to the same SSRC. > > BUG=webrtc:5654 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2893293003 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18399} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/1476a9d789db03457595cf7dbea7e362972f2a4d [email protected],[email protected] # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=webrtc:5654 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2919313005 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18446}
Any progress on this? |
Unfortunately not, I think building it yourself using their build scripts is the way to go. I haven't gotten around to it yet, so let me know how it goes. |
After about 3 hours and around 18 GB later, here is the result: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8oc6KvX3aZRazNLQ2RIYzFuVUU/view?usp=sharing (untested, don't ask me about how to use it, just fresh from the oven :)) |
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 29, 2017
…ErrorCorrection. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2919313005/ ) Reason for revert: Fix RtpStreamReceiver to not recover RTX packets with incorrect SSRC. Original issue's description: > Revert of Only compare sequence numbers from the same SSRC in ForwardErrorCorrection. (patchset #5 id:120001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2893293003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Breaks fuzzer. > > Original issue's description: > > Only compare sequence numbers from the same SSRC in ForwardErrorCorrection. > > > > Prior to this CL, the ForwardErrorCorrection state would be reset whenever > > the difference in sequence numbers of the last recovered media packet > > and the new packet (media or FEC) was too large. This comparison did not > > take into account that FlexFEC uses a different SSRC for the FEC packets, > > meaning that the the state would be reset very frequently when FlexFEC > > is used. This should not have led to any major problems, except for a > > decreased decoding efficiency. > > > > This CL verifies that whenever we compare sequence numbers in > > ForwardErrorCorrection, they do indeed belong to the same SSRC. > > > > BUG=webrtc:5654 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2893293003 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18399} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/1476a9d789db03457595cf7dbea7e362972f2a4d > > [email protected],[email protected] > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > BUG=webrtc:5654 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2919313005 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18446} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/92732ecc5ccc81e17c1dea75ecc5e34c7ff6274f [email protected] BUG=webrtc:5654 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2918333002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#18827}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2017
…buffer is filled with a single frame. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2993513002/ ) Reason for revert: Break performance bots. Original issue's description: > Fix off-by-one bugs in video_coding::PacketBuffer when the buffer is filled with a single frame. > > BUG=webrtc:8028 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2993513002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19209} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/ee13e8919c20de5860a510e91fac71fd5a7e9b8d [email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=webrtc:8028 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2990183002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19211}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 4, 2017
…buffer is filled with a single frame. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2990183002/ ) Reason for revert: Revert to create fix CL. Original issue's description: > Revert of Fix off-by-one bugs in video_coding::PacketBuffer when the buffer is filled with a single frame. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2993513002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Break performance bots. > > Original issue's description: > > Fix off-by-one bugs in video_coding::PacketBuffer when the buffer is filled with a single frame. > > > > BUG=webrtc:8028 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2993513002 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19209} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/ee13e8919c20de5860a510e91fac71fd5a7e9b8d > > [email protected] > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=webrtc:8028 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2990183002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19211} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/c18f1d7c9432a2bf7d112820eb2b1dd2dbe2ba4b [email protected] # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=webrtc:8028 [email protected] Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2989313003 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19249}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 15, 2017
…APIs (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2995523002/ ) Reason for revert: Breaks compilation in google3. Original issue's description: > L16 implementation of the Audio{En,De}coderFactoryTemplate APIs > > BUG=webrtc:7836, webrtc:7842 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2995523002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19354} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/edff94df62d5cc0563430ed8d5e2ba8c9f88f7dd [email protected],[email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=webrtc:7836, webrtc:7842 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2996993002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19356}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2017
…(patchset #5 id:150001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2968003003/ ) Reason for revert: Causes failures on perf bots https://luci-milo.appspot.com/buildbot/client.webrtc.perf/Mac%2010.11/3567 Original issue's description: > Stop silently accepting unsupported flags in test binaries > > Instead explicitly ignore only the flags we know should be ignored. > > BUG=webrtc:7568 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2968003003 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19412} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/a2782f6f5d350e423b8166d603f44e17e1d7540b [email protected],[email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=webrtc:7568 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3002963002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19413}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 22, 2017
…(patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3002963002/ ) Reason for revert: Relanding without changes. Problem with unused flags was fixed in https://codereview.webrtc.org/2998143002/ Original issue's description: > Revert of Stop silently accepting unsupported flags in test binaries (patchset #5 id:150001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/2968003003/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Causes failures on perf bots > https://luci-milo.appspot.com/buildbot/client.webrtc.perf/Mac%2010.11/3567 > > Original issue's description: > > Stop silently accepting unsupported flags in test binaries > > > > Instead explicitly ignore only the flags we know should be ignored. > > > > BUG=webrtc:7568 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2968003003 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19412} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/a2782f6f5d350e423b8166d603f44e17e1d7540b > > [email protected],[email protected] > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=webrtc:7568 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3002963002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19413} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/d64072c598875cdf3a8ce5806d3410125363596d [email protected],[email protected] # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=webrtc:7568 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/2999383002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19455}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 4, 2017
…review.webrtc.org/3008773002/ ) Reason for revert: A few perf tests broken, including RampUpTest.UpDownUpAbsSendTimeSimulcastRedRtx RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberRtx RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberPacketLoss Original issue's description: > Use RtxReceiveStream. > > This also has the beneficial side-effect that when a media stream > which is protected by FlexFEC receives an RTX retransmission, the > retransmitted media packet is passed into the FlexFEC machinery, > which should improve its ability to recover packets via FEC. > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19649} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/5c0f6c62ea3b1d2c43f8fc152961af27033475f7 [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true NOTRY=true BUG=webrtc:7135 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3010983002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19653}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 6, 2017
…ew.webrtc.org/3010983002/ ) Reason for revert: Intend to fix perf failures and reland. Original issue's description: > Revert of Use RtxReceiveStream. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > A few perf tests broken, including > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpAbsSendTimeSimulcastRedRtx > RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberRtx > RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberPacketLoss > > > Original issue's description: > > Use RtxReceiveStream. > > > > This also has the beneficial side-effect that when a media stream > > which is protected by FlexFEC receives an RTX retransmission, the > > retransmitted media packet is passed into the FlexFEC machinery, > > which should improve its ability to recover packets via FEC. > > > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19649} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/5c0f6c62ea3b1d2c43f8fc152961af27033475f7 > > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > NOTRY=true > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3010983002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19653} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/3c39c0137afa274d1d524b150b50304b38a2847b [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. NOPRESUBMIT=true NOTREECHECKS=true BUG=webrtc:7135 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3006063002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19715}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 8, 2017
…ereview.webrtc.org/3006063002/ ) Reason for revert: This change appears to break ulpfec, with severe regressions, e.g., for webrtc_perf_test FullStackTest.ForemanCifPlr5Ulpfec Original issue's description: > Reland of Use RtxReceiveStream. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3010983002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > Intend to fix perf failures and reland. > > Original issue's description: > > Revert of Use RtxReceiveStream. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002/ ) > > > > Reason for revert: > > A few perf tests broken, including > > > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpAbsSendTimeSimulcastRedRtx > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberRtx > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberPacketLoss > > > > > > Original issue's description: > > > Use RtxReceiveStream. > > > > > > This also has the beneficial side-effect that when a media stream > > > which is protected by FlexFEC receives an RTX retransmission, the > > > retransmitted media packet is passed into the FlexFEC machinery, > > > which should improve its ability to recover packets via FEC. > > > > > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002 > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19649} > > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/5c0f6c62ea3b1d2c43f8fc152961af27033475f7 > > > > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > > NOPRESUBMIT=true > > NOTREECHECKS=true > > NOTRY=true > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3010983002 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19653} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/3c39c0137afa274d1d524b150b50304b38a2847b > > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > NOPRESUBMIT=true > NOTREECHECKS=true > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3006063002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19715} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/35713eaf565c0fef07c8afc158d7b8fdf7ec3d78 [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=webrtc:7135 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3007303002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19744}
jenkins-pristine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 11, 2017
…ew.webrtc.org/3007303002/ ) Reason for revert: Identified a configuration problem in the video quality tests. Intend to fix and reland. Original issue's description: > Revert of Use RtxReceiveStream. (patchset #5 id:320001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3006063002/ ) > > Reason for revert: > This change appears to break ulpfec, with severe regressions, e.g., for webrtc_perf_test FullStackTest.ForemanCifPlr5Ulpfec > > Original issue's description: > > Reland of Use RtxReceiveStream. (patchset #1 id:1 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3010983002/ ) > > > > Reason for revert: > > Intend to fix perf failures and reland. > > > > Original issue's description: > > > Revert of Use RtxReceiveStream. (patchset #5 id:80001 of https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002/ ) > > > > > > Reason for revert: > > > A few perf tests broken, including > > > > > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpAbsSendTimeSimulcastRedRtx > > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberRtx > > > RampUpTest.UpDownUpTransportSequenceNumberPacketLoss > > > > > > > > > Original issue's description: > > > > Use RtxReceiveStream. > > > > > > > > This also has the beneficial side-effect that when a media stream > > > > which is protected by FlexFEC receives an RTX retransmission, the > > > > retransmitted media packet is passed into the FlexFEC machinery, > > > > which should improve its ability to recover packets via FEC. > > > > > > > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > > > > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3008773002 > > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19649} > > > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/5c0f6c62ea3b1d2c43f8fc152961af27033475f7 > > > > > > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > > > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > > > NOPRESUBMIT=true > > > NOTREECHECKS=true > > > NOTRY=true > > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3010983002 > > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19653} > > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/3c39c0137afa274d1d524b150b50304b38a2847b > > > > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > > # Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago. > > NOPRESUBMIT=true > > NOTREECHECKS=true > > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3006063002 > > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19715} > > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/35713eaf565c0fef07c8afc158d7b8fdf7ec3d78 > > [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] > # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. > BUG=webrtc:7135 > > Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3007303002 > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19744} > Committed: https://chromium.googlesource.com/external/webrtc/+/8e7eee035178a7f10e19883681b5eaa4a7523107 [email protected],[email protected],[email protected],[email protected] # Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago. BUG=webrtc:7135 Review-Url: https://codereview.webrtc.org/3012963002 Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#19765}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Dear sir/madame,
My Android application has a dependency on your libjingle build, version 11139, found here.
It used to receive frequent updates; however, since December 2015 no new updates have been posted. Has this wonderful service been discontinued, or are the updates available elsewhere?
Sincerely,
Arjan Boschman
PS: This issue was also referenced here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: