You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It probably have sense to introduce combined "Duplicate and unpublish" action to allow quick copy of documents, and also introduce some kind of "template/draft" flag, so newly created copy not became published, even then it has proper start/end dates set for that.
Then we promote "template/draft" document to regular one (by removing this flag on save/update), it will be saved as new document, not inheriting original document created/last modified dates. I think this approach will play nice along with the DNN page templates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
roman-yagodin
changed the title
RFC: Duplicate and unpublish action, template/unpublished flag
RFC: Duplicate and unpublish action, template documents
Aug 11, 2020
roman-yagodin
changed the title
RFC: Duplicate and unpublish action, template documents
RFC: Duplicate and unpublish action, template/draft documents
Aug 13, 2020
roman-yagodin
changed the title
RFC: Duplicate and unpublish action, template/draft documents
Duplicate and unpublish action, template/draft documents
Mar 11, 2021
It probably have sense to introduce combined "Duplicate and unpublish" action to allow quick copy of documents, and also introduce some kind of "template/draft" flag, so newly created copy not became published, even then it has proper start/end dates set for that.
Then we promote "template/draft" document to regular one (by removing this flag on save/update), it will be saved as new document, not inheriting original document created/last modified dates. I think this approach will play nice along with the DNN page templates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: