Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prevent cwl-ts from deleting requirements #112

Open
ghost opened this issue Sep 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Prevent cwl-ts from deleting requirements #112

ghost opened this issue Sep 17, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 17, 2020

cwl-ts deletes workflow requirements and then puts them back. This should be fixed such that cwl-ts only adds requirements, never deletes existing ones.

@ghost ghost assigned marijanlekic Sep 17, 2020
ghost pushed a commit to rabix/composer that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2020
We still have to refactor cwlts such that it never deletes
any requirements. rabix/cwl-ts#112

Closes #466
@ghost ghost assigned milosdanilov Oct 2, 2020
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 2, 2020

Reference commit: 507951e

dependabot bot added a commit to rabix/composer that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2020
We still have to refactor cwlts such that it never deletes
any requirements. rabix/cwl-ts#112

Closes #466
dependabot bot added a commit to rabix/composer that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2020
We still have to refactor cwlts such that it never deletes
any requirements. rabix/cwl-ts#112

Closes #466
dependabot bot added a commit to rabix/composer that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2020
We still have to refactor cwlts such that it never deletes
any requirements. rabix/cwl-ts#112

Closes #466
dependabot bot added a commit to rabix/composer that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2020
We still have to refactor cwlts such that it never deletes
any requirements. rabix/cwl-ts#112

Closes #466
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants