You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we have sorting 1->10>100 which is fine when your files are named 001, 002 and so on. For people with big collections of files named 1->2->...->10 this means files will be sorted in wrong order and require a lot of batch name changing, which can be especially bad if the pages in archives are also named like this.
Currently we have sorting 1->10>100 which is fine when your files are named 001, 002 and so on. For people with big collections of files named 1->2->...->10 this means files will be sorted in wrong order and require a lot of batch name changing, which can be especially bad if the pages in archives are also named like this.
I propose using natural sort order/human readable sort order and optionally option to enable/disable it in settings. Some helpful algorithms might be found here: http://blog.codinghorror.com/sorting-for-humans-natural-sort-order/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: