Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nuget group issues in combination with Chocolatey #306

Open
daemenseth opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Nuget group issues in combination with Chocolatey #306

daemenseth opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@daemenseth
Copy link

We use the Sonatype Nexus repository to host nuget feeds for chocolatey packages.
We have a group which contains 2 hosted feeds.

This had worked perfectly but after some upgrades of chocolatey we had issues that the choco search did not list al the packages of the feeds but a subnet of them.

See also this github issue: Choco search not returning all results from Nexus and Artifactory repositories · Issue #3270 · chocolatey/choco (github.com)

The suggestion is to add /index.json to the url to forece a v3 nuget.
This resolves the seach problem.

But introduces a new problem that depencies are not working.

When we add both nuget hosted feeds directly to the client without a group there is no problem at all.

We like the features of grouping the hosted feeds. Has someone a solutions for this

@mrprescott
Copy link

@daemenseth, thanks for filing this, and for your analysis on how we might approach the solution. We don't have explicit support for chocolatey, which is why this has come unglued under v3. I'm classifying this as an 'enhancement' for the meantime.

@pauby
Copy link

pauby commented Mar 11, 2024

@mrprescott Chocolatey products don't need explicit support in any repository manager, as they use the standards of NuGet v2 (where they are defined) and v3.

If Nexus follows those standards, nothing else is needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants