We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be neat to have Sopel to use https://ircv3.net/specs/client-tags/reply in the replies.
When bot replies with PRIVMSG, it could add the +draft/reply to the PRIVMSG , see example in: https://ircv3.net/specs/client-tags/reply#examples
There is implemented at least in Irccloud and Limnoria.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm all for this, but not during the draft stage.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Draft stage should be ending soon, if all goes to plan: ircv3/ircv3-specifications#535
Let's plan on this for 8.1, unless ratification fails for some reason.
No branches or pull requests
The problem
It would be neat to have Sopel to use https://ircv3.net/specs/client-tags/reply in the replies.
The solution
When bot replies with PRIVMSG, it could add the +draft/reply to the PRIVMSG , see example in: https://ircv3.net/specs/client-tags/reply#examples
Notes
There is implemented at least in Irccloud and Limnoria.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: