You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
You've got a point there. It's not ideal, but I did it like that so I could have gaps in the timeline. In your example, if you wanted to have a constant value between 2 and 4, add a "4 linear to 10". It might make more sense to not have gaps and have a separate storyline for "on/off" values. I don't really mind either way. Thoughts?
I thought about it and asked these questions: What does it mean to have a gap in the timeline? Or what does an 'off' value mean? For me it means to stay at the current value until there is a new instruction.
I think the issue is that there is a difference between cut and ease or linear. "4 cut to -5" means wait until t = 4 then cut to -5. "4 linear to -5" means start interpolating from the previous t until t = 4.
In other words cut is at, while ease or linear are from / to.
I don't think there is anything wrong with this. My suggestion here is to make them all equivalent by giving cut a from / to behaviour, where from would be the previous value and to would be an immediate change to the new value at t.
Consider the following example:
At
t = 0
,x
is 0.At
t = 1
,x
is some value between 0 and 10.At
t = 2
,x
is 10.At
t = 3
,x
is null.At
t = 4
,x
is -5.I would expect
x
to hold its value until the next point. In this example, to stay at 10 for 2 seconds and then cut to -5.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: