-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inmmature versus bearing orchards #38
Comments
@josue-medellin currently there is not any distinction between immature and mature orchards in the ET calculations. All the ET calculations are using the landuse categories delineated by level 2 Land IQ which lumps all "orchards" together. Immature orchards could be broken out using the |
So we are merging into one category young and bearing orchards in the calculations, right? |
Yes. That is essentially correct. Breaking out the young vs bearing orchard could be done with a little time and effort. I think that the best approach is to modify the landuse raster in EE to include the young classes as new classes in level 2 since that is how the spreadsheet is set up to process the raw json. |
@andybell can we do a quick test (not today) for Wednesday just to quantify the difference in vineyards or "{other deciduous"? using this further categorization? Back burner. is just for reference. |
I calculated about 7,800 non bearing acres. 13% of 5,800 acres of almonds, and 85% of 8,600 other orchards and pistachios. This is back burner. NO worries. |
@qjhart @andybell
Andy, can we check if immature orchards were included in the daily average ET calculations? My understanding is that the category is explicit in the Land IQ land use dataset.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: