You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When using a playbook scan, I thought it odd that jwt_tool suggests HS attacks when the algorithm is RS (and doesn't suggest RS attacks):
$ python jwt_tool.py -rh 'Authorization: Foo eyJhb...' -t 'https://test-target.willhackforsushi.com/api/v1/capabilities' -M pb
...
Token header values:
[+] alg = "RS256"
...
LAUNCHING SCAN: JWT Attack Playbook
...
The following additional checks should be performed that are better tested manually:
[+] Try testing HS token against weak password configurations by running the following hashcat cracking options:
(Already testing against passwords in jwt-common.txt)
Try using longer dictionaries, custom dictionaries, mangling rules, or brute force attacks.
hashcat (https://hashcat.net/hashcat/) is ideal for this as it is highly optimised for speed. Just add your JWT to a text file, then use the following syntax to give you a good start:
[*] dictionary attacks: hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 jwt.txt passlist.txt
[*] rule-based attack: hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 jwt.txt passlist.txt -r rules/best64.rule
[*] brute-force attack: hashcat -a 3 -m 16500 jwt.txt ?u?l?l?l?l?l?l?l -i --increment-min=6
[+] Try waiting for the token to expire ("exp" value set to: 2022-11-02 07:57:35 (UTC))
Check if still working once expired.
It looks like lines 1514 and 1518 check headDict['alg'] for the algorithm type, but this value is changed somewhere else (also noted at line 1377 where is is saved as origalg).
This is a tiny issue, PR incoming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
joswr1ght
added a commit
to joswr1ght/jwt_tool
that referenced
this issue
Nov 2, 2022
When using a playbook scan, I thought it odd that jwt_tool suggests HS attacks when the algorithm is RS (and doesn't suggest RS attacks):
It looks like lines 1514 and 1518 check
headDict['alg']
for the algorithm type, but this value is changed somewhere else (also noted at line 1377 where is is saved asorigalg
).This is a tiny issue, PR incoming.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: