Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

faster copy #18

Open
tkhyn opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

faster copy #18

tkhyn opened this issue Apr 26, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request major

Comments

@tkhyn
Copy link
Owner

tkhyn commented Apr 26, 2018

Original report by Anonymous.

a faster file copier than shutil.copy might be used for win32 platforms. eg. copyx or robocopy.
@tkhyn
Copy link
Owner Author

tkhyn commented Apr 27, 2018

Hi again, I'm not sure that making a subprocess call to robocopy or copyx to copy the files one by one would be any faster.

I'm not using dirsync much these days and have little time to dedicate to its improvement, so feel free to do some testing / profiling and submit a PR!

@tkhyn tkhyn added major enhancement New feature or request labels Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request major
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tkhyn