We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently we are only getting user-mode cycles from libpfc. We should probably track all cycles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Compare for example:
./uarch-bench.sh --test-name=syscall/* --timer=libpfc --extra-events=skl::UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES
which gives:
** Running group syscall : Syscall benches ** Benchmark Cycles UNHALT getuid() glibc call 48.00 706.69 getuid using syscall() 53.00 706.41 getpid using syscall() 53.00 726.17 close() on a non-existent FD 69.00 729.68 non-existent syscall 72.00 665.44 getuid direct syscall 41.00 699.77 non-existent direct syscall 41.00 631.84 syscall+lfence before 51.36 641.31 syscall+lfence after 52.32 644.63 back-to-back lfence 4.88 4.88 parallel-misses 16.93 16.96 mfenced misses 234.90 235.05 sfenced misses 17.18 17.20 lfenced misses 181.29 181.40 syscall misses 234.79 831.68 misses + lfence + syscall 244.98 835.93
Note how the Cycles column is impossibly low, while the skl::UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES (UNHALT) column shows the correct time.
Cycles
skl::UNHALTED_CORE_CYCLES
UNHALT
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Currently we are only getting user-mode cycles from libpfc. We should probably track all cycles.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: