Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Referencing resources outside directory containing the package document #1272

Open
mattgarrish opened this issue Jul 12, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
Assignees
Labels
priority: low To be processed when time allows spec: EPUB 3.3 Impacting the support of EPUB 3.3 status: accepted Ready to be further processed

Comments

@mattgarrish
Copy link
Member

Probably low priority if we want to check this, but there is now authoring guidance not to reference resources outside the directory containing the package document because not all reading systems allow this (i.e., the resources won't be used/rendered).

Would only be an informative message if it is checked.

See w3c/epub-specs#1687

@mattgarrish mattgarrish added the spec: EPUB 3.3 Impacting the support of EPUB 3.3 label Jul 12, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour added the status: accepted Ready to be further processed label Nov 13, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour added this to the v5.0.0-beta-1 milestone Nov 13, 2021
@rdeltour rdeltour modified the milestones: v5.0.0-beta, v5.0.0 Nov 17, 2022
@rdeltour rdeltour modified the milestones: v5.0.0, v5.0.0-rc Dec 8, 2022
@rdeltour rdeltour self-assigned this Dec 15, 2022
@rdeltour rdeltour added the priority: low To be processed when time allows label Dec 23, 2022
@rdeltour
Copy link
Member

Moving this one out of v5.0.0, this is low priority.

@rdeltour rdeltour removed this from the v5.0.0-rc milestone Dec 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority: low To be processed when time allows spec: EPUB 3.3 Impacting the support of EPUB 3.3 status: accepted Ready to be further processed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants