Feedback - use of AI to create alternative descriptions - for a future update to guideline

[chrisONIX]

I had feedback in the form of a question to open a discussion, rather than to include in this version of the Guidelines.
If a publishers uses AI in the creation of alternative descriptions, should this information be made available in the metadata as well?
If there are human checks, or no human checks on the quality of the alternative descriptions, should this be indicated in the metadata?
Would this level of information be useful for users or readers ?

[GeorgeKerscher]

I think that AI is going to be used in many places not only for Alt text or image descriptions. A publisher is responsible for the content, and as part of the editorial process they stribe to make the title meets their quality standards.

I do think that if AI descriptions are provided without their editorial review, then the end user should be alerted. This would give the reader an indication that the descriptions should be treated like other AI generated descriptions, e.g. be suspicious.
the reader a

[mattgarrish]

This sounds like context for the summary.