Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please help to clarify "authors" in 1.1 #141

Open
lianqi opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Please help to clarify "authors" in 1.1 #141

lianqi opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@lianqi
Copy link

lianqi commented Dec 24, 2024

Hi TAG, when translating this document into Chinese, I finding more clarification is needed to translate the term "authors" more accurately.

In 1.1, it says "Spec developers, authors, and reviewers can use it to guide their thinking. " And there is another sentence mentioning this word in the following paragraph, saying "For actionable guidance applicable to spec editors, site authors, and others designing and building parts of the web platform". Therefore, it seems the "authors" in the first paragraph of 1.1 probably means "site authors".

Different documents/groups in W3C have different concepts/ways of use for "author". If the terms such as "author" and "developer" appears alone, it can be confusing about which group of people it refers to.

Here are some examples.

  • In Process Document, it is used as "authors of the specification".
  • In A11Y, it is used at content author, see more in ATAG2.0.
  • In I18N, it is used as content/website author. And the same seems to apply to CSS WG as well.
@lianqi lianqi changed the title Please help to clarify "authors" in this document Please help to clarify "authors" in 1.1 Dec 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant