-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Command for lemmata #5
Comments
Generally, I can't decide on what should be in the commands by default and what would clutter it. Suddenly we could also end up having commands for stating invariants, observations, etc. All of those would do pretty much the same imo Interested to hear your opinion. |
I didn't include Or there could be an equivalent of LaTeX's |
Having only theorems, definitions and proofs is a quite minimalist approach (but not a bad one) and might not suffice for everyone. But I guess it depends on the person's taste.
something like
What do you think about adding an optional argument for translations? Then we might also need some map-like structure to pass it translations that concern us. |
I've added a |
There are commands for easily displaying theorems, proofs, and definitions.
However, when writing lecture notes I find myself often writing some simple lemmata. I feel like it would be natural to have a command similar to [dfn ] for lemmata :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: