You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On a 540×940 px screen, the display is too small to read numbers, as you can see in the screenshot.
Possible workaroud: horizontal view. But, this way, trigonometric functions names can't fit with that big font. Could it be smaller?
Expected behavior
Vertical view should have enough room to read current operation and result.
Horizontal view may display functions in smaller font size to fit inside the button.
Actual behavior
User can hardly see what's being written.
Calc You version
1.2
Android version
Android 10
Other details
Device: Motorola E2
To compare, I attach a screenshot of android calculator. As you can notice, the main numeric keyboard is as big as CalcYou numeric keyboard. I don't know if this is useful, but it seems not to be a coincidence, is it?
Acknowledgements
I have searched the existing issues and this is a new ticket, NOT a duplicate or related to another open issue.
I have written a short but informative title.
I will fill out all of the requested information in this form.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Steps to reproduce
On a 540×940 px screen, the display is too small to read numbers, as you can see in the screenshot.
Possible workaroud: horizontal view. But, this way, trigonometric functions names can't fit with that big font. Could it be smaller?
Expected behavior
Vertical view should have enough room to read current operation and result.
Horizontal view may display functions in smaller font size to fit inside the button.
Actual behavior
User can hardly see what's being written.
Calc You version
1.2
Android version
Android 10
Other details
Device: Motorola E2
To compare, I attach a screenshot of android calculator. As you can notice, the main numeric keyboard is as big as CalcYou numeric keyboard. I don't know if this is useful, but it seems not to be a coincidence, is it?
Acknowledgements
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: