You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just to note that at the CSL project, we're hoping to close work on v1.1 in the coming weeks.
The most significant changes/additions are features which are closely modeled on, or exactly the same as, those in CSL-M; notably the intext and conditions elements. So if you support those, should be trivial to support v1.1 also.
Dates on the input model are also changing, with priority going forward on EDTF.
I was wondering: could we use this issue to update on where zotero and this project stands on the above?
Are we basically good ATM for example, after recent merged PRs for the json schema?
I'm particularly interested in thoughts on the rich-text schema, which is basically a strawman suggestion of how to formalize and generalize the current html-like tags.
Just to note that at the CSL project, we're hoping to close work on
v1.1
in the coming weeks.The most significant changes/additions are features which are closely modeled on, or exactly the same as, those in CSL-M; notably the
intext
andconditions
elements. So if you support those, should be trivial to supportv1.1
also.Dates on the input model are also changing, with priority going forward on EDTF.
Please weigh in if any feedback. We're currently discussing some big questions; cf citation-style-language/schema#268.
Also,
v1.0.2
should be tagged in the next week; this adds new variables, types, terms mostly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: