Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.9]omit pod erdma resource when daemon not enable erdma #732

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

BSWANG
Copy link
Member

@BSWANG BSWANG commented Dec 3, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 17.42%. Comparing base (0174700) to head (c974fbc).
Report is 2 commits behind head on release-1.9.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pkg/k8s/k8s.go 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           release-1.9     #732      +/-   ##
===============================================
- Coverage        17.45%   17.42%   -0.03%     
===============================================
  Files              126      126              
  Lines            16611    16610       -1     
===============================================
- Hits              2899     2895       -4     
- Misses           13371    13374       +3     
  Partials           341      341              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 17.42% <0.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@BSWANG BSWANG changed the title omit pod erdma resource when daemon not enable erdma [1.9]omit pod erdma resource when daemon not enable erdma Dec 3, 2024
@l1b0k l1b0k merged commit 19ce503 into AliyunContainerService:release-1.9 Dec 3, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@BSWANG BSWANG deleted the release-1.9 branch December 3, 2024 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants