-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
new_audit: use a strong HSTS policy #16257
Conversation
… update:sample-json.
… into hsts-audit
… Also hide the result from the report UI.
…il docs are published, some text phrasings and the smoke test assertions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall LGTM! Thanks for the contributions!
Co-authored-by: Adam Raine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adam Raine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adam Raine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adam Raine <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adam Raine <[email protected]>
Thanks Adam! Is there anything left to do from my side here? |
Don't think so! |
Thanks for including the proper Link, Adam! I didn't know when my doc got pushed to https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/best-practices/has-hsts. But that was actually quite fast :D |
…use/best-practices/has-hsts. Updating json files to account for the changes.
Ran update:sample-json to account for the string change in the last commit. |
Summary
Adding a new audit to Ligththouse, which detects deviations from an optimal HSTS header deployment.
Part of a larger change to introduce more similar header deployments.
Link to documentation is pending internal discussions (@adamraine FYI, either of us can update the Link here once we have the blog post done).