Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor form components #659

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025
Merged

Refactor form components #659

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Jan 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Here are the release notes for this update:

  • New Features

    • Added barcode scanning functionality with a new barcode input component
    • Enhanced form input components with improved styling and interaction
  • Improvements

    • Updated localization support across multiple languages
    • Refined form themes and input styling
    • Added support for multiple barcode decoder types
  • Dependencies

    • Integrated Quagga library for barcode scanning
  • Localization

    • Added "Click to open camera" translations for barcode input across 20+ languages

chiragchhatrala and others added 6 commits December 16, 2024 19:54
- Introduced a new BarcodeInput component for scanning barcodes using the Quagga library.
- Updated package.json and package-lock.json to include Quagga as a dependency.
- Enhanced form themes to accommodate the new BarcodeInput component.
- Added localization support for barcode scanning actions in English.
- Updated blocks_types.json to register the new barcode input type.

These changes improve the application's functionality by allowing users to scan barcodes directly within forms, enhancing user experience and data input efficiency.
- Removed unused box shadow styles from tailwind.config.js.
- Enhanced DateInput, FileInput, MatrixInput, RichTextAreaInput, and VSelect components with improved styling and error handling.
- Updated theme settings in form-themes.js to include new styles for MatrixInput and other form elements.
- Adjusted labels in FieldOptions.vue for clarity.
- Improved overall UI consistency and responsiveness across form components.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive implementation of barcode scanning functionality across multiple components and files. The primary addition is the BarcodeInput.vue component, which enables users to scan barcodes using their device's camera. The changes span form input components, localization files, themes, and configuration settings, creating a cohesive barcode scanning experience with multi-language support and flexible theming.

Changes

File Change Summary
client/components/forms/BarcodeInput.vue New component for barcode scanning with camera integration
client/components/forms/components/CameraUpload.vue Enhanced to support barcode detection using Quagga library
client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue Added support for barcode field type
client/data/blocks_types.json New block type added for barcode input
client/package.json Added quagga dependency for barcode scanning
client/i18n/lang/*.json Added localized "Click to open camera" messages across 20+ languages

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant BarcodeInput
    participant CameraUpload
    participant Quagga
    
    User->>BarcodeInput: Click to scan
    BarcodeInput->>CameraUpload: Initiate camera
    CameraUpload->>Quagga: Start barcode detection
    Quagga-->>CameraUpload: Barcode detected
    CameraUpload-->>BarcodeInput: Return scanned value
    BarcodeInput->>User: Display scanned barcode
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Reviewers

  • JhumanJ

Poem

🐰 Barcode Bunny's Scanning Song 📷

With camera ready and Quagga's might,
I hop and scan from left to right!
A digital whisker, a techno-twitch,
Decoding secrets without a hitch!
Beep beep, my barcode's in sight! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
client/i18n/lang/bn.json (1)

Line range hint 1-42: Fix encoding issue in fileInput.uploadingFile.

There's an encoding issue in the existing text where "আপলোড" (upload) is partially corrupted and showing as "���পলোড".

Apply this fix to correct the encoding:

-            "uploadingFile": "আপনার ফাইল ���পলোড হচ্ছে..."
+            "uploadingFile": "আপনার ফাইল আপলোড হচ্ছে..."
🧹 Nitpick comments (36)
client/components/forms/RichTextAreaInput.client.vue (7)

23-24: Clarify style precedence for --font-size
You are merging inputStyle with the default style object, which includes --font-size: theme.default.fontSize. If inputStyle also sets --font-size, it might override the theme’s default. Confirm whether this override is desired.


77-77: Check the return from useFormInput
The destructured objects { compVal, inputStyle, hasError, inputWrapperProps } are used properly, but confirm if you need watchers or computed for compVal or inputStyle to respond to external changes in editorOptions.

Do you want me to propose an implementation that handles updates to editorOptions dynamically?


122-122: Validate the fixed minimum height
min-height: 100px ensures comfortable space, but consider making it conditional or configurable if some uses require more flexible styling, especially for small or large text areas.


133-133: Check radius usage
.ql-header { @apply rounded-md } is good for consistency, but verify that it doesn’t break alignment or cause content overflow in some quill modules (e.g., headers in code blocks).


137-137: Augment placeholder styling for better visual feedback
Using @apply text-gray-400 for .ql-editor.ql-blank:before might be too faint on darker backgrounds. Ensure this text remains accessible and meets contrast requirements.


141-141: Ensure color consistency in hover and focus states
Applying @apply text-nt-blue is fine, but confirm it doesn’t conflict with brand guidelines or toward other form inputs that use a different hover/focus color scheme.


168-168: Consistent mention styling
Styling mention spans with a distinct color scheme highlights mentions, but ensure that these custom classes integrate smoothly with dark mode (e.g., text visibility, background color).

client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (5)

221-221: Collapsible import
Registering the Collapsible component here clarifies usage locally. Consider lazy-loading if performance or file size becomes a concern.


255-255: Initializing component state
Storing defaultValue from modelValue is good for reference, though you may want to add watchers if new props should reset the state.


274-274: Added debouncing to remote calls
Wrapping remote in debounce helps reduce API call frequency. Evaluate if 300ms is optimal for your user experience.


287-291: Fuse.js integration
This is a straightforward Fuse.js usage. Check if you need advanced matching config (e.g., threshold, distance) if you find the default search results too broad/narrow.


409-409: Spacing and consistency
Having a blank line or partial comment at the end of the file is a minor detail, but it's usually good practice to ensure consistent file endings.

client/components/forms/components/CameraUpload.vue (2)

131-131: Track Quagga state with 'quaggaInitialized'.
Storing a boolean helps avoid re-initialization. Should the component allow re-init after an interruption, consider resetting if needed.


169-201: Init Quagga with robust error handling.
Good job initializing Quagga with decoders. For reliability, consider adding:

  1. A user-facing error message if initialization fails.
  2. Additional callbacks (e.g., onProcessed) for debug info.
client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue (1)

47-54: Conditional class application for disabled state.
Adding !cursor-not-allowed with background color changes is straightforward. Check for edge cases if the field is both disabled and invalid.

client/components/forms/BarcodeInput.vue (1)

125-163: Lifecycle management & watchers.
• The scannedValue watcher writes directly to compVal for form integration.
handleBarcodeDetected cleanly stops scanning.
Consider a re-scan workflow for invalid codes.

client/lib/forms/themes/form-themes.js (11)

58-60: Enhanced “SelectInput” styling.

You moved bg-white into a separate property (background) and introduced chevronGradient. This separation clarifies the structure. Test thoroughly if the dropdown coloring is consistent in both light/dark modes.


104-104: Minor formatting improvement for CheckboxInput.

Collapsing brackets is mostly stylistic, but be consistent across the codebase.


111-111: Minor formatting improvement for SwitchInput.

Similar to CheckboxInput, keep code style consistent for maintainability.


128-128: Minor formatting improvement for RatingInput.

Identical style note as above for consistency.


261-261: CheckboxInput formatting consistency.

Again, minor bracket formatting. Keep consistent across theme definitions.


268-268: SwitchInput bracket styling.

Same note; unify formatting if possible.


280-280: RatingInput bracket styling.

Same ongoing theme consistency note.


368-371: SelectInput revised styling in notion theme.

Looks consistent with notion’s brand. Just confirm the gradient doesn’t clash with certain color combos or expansions.


413-413: CheckboxInput bracket styling.

Maintain consistent bracket usage as discussed.


420-420: SwitchInput bracket styling.

Same note: keep bracket usage uniform.


437-437: RatingInput bracket styling.

Maintain consistent code style throughout.

client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (3)

80-100: Ensure the barcode field is clearly explained to users.
The barcode reader block is well-structured; however, consider adding user guidance or a helper text explaining how decoders work and why multiple selections may be beneficial. This can reduce confusion and improve user experience.


635-643: Validate expanded decoder support.
Your barcodeDecodersOptions currently lists a subset of popular decoders. If you plan to expand or localize the list, ensure this array is maintained consistently in the future to prevent missing decoders or duplication.


860-862: Synchronize default decoders with the available options.
The default decoders ['ean_reader', 'upc_reader'] are a practical choice. If you want to ensure that newly available decoders are widely used, consider incorporating them here too, or clarifying to end users which decoders are enabled by default.

client/i18n/lang/en.json (1)

39-41: Improve English phrasing for better UX.

The current translation "Click to open a camera" uses an unnecessary article. Consider using either "Click to open camera" or "Click to open the camera" for more natural English.

         "barcodeInput": {
-            "clickToOpenCamera": "Click to open a camera"
+            "clickToOpenCamera": "Click to open camera"
         }
client/i18n/lang/vi.json (1)

39-41: Consider consistent capitalization across languages.

The Vietnamese translation capitalizes "Camera" while Arabic and English versions use lowercase. Consider standardizing the capitalization across all languages.

         "barcodeInput": {
-            "clickToOpenCamera": "Nhấp để mở Camera"
+            "clickToOpenCamera": "Nhấp để mở camera"
         }
client/i18n/lang/mr.json (1)

Line range hint 1-41: Consider implementing a shared schema for translations.

Since we're adding the same translation key across multiple language files, it would be beneficial to:

  1. Implement a shared schema/type definition for translations to ensure consistency
  2. Add automated validation to catch missing translations across language files

Would you like me to propose a TypeScript interface or JSON schema for the translations structure?

client/i18n/lang/jv.json (1)

40-42: Consider revising the Javanese translation for accuracy

The current translation "Klik kanggo nggawe kamera" uses "nggawe" (make/create) which might not be the most accurate translation for "open camera". Consider using "mbukak" instead:

-            "clickToOpenCamera": "Klik kanggo nggawe kamera"
+            "clickToOpenCamera": "Klik kanggo mbukak kamera"
client/i18n/lang/es.json (1)

40-42: Consider refining the Spanish translation for better naturalness.

The current translation "Haga clic para abrir una cámara" is grammatically correct but could be more idiomatic. Consider using "Haga clic para abrir la cámara" instead, as it sounds more natural in Spanish when referring to the device's camera.

         "barcodeInput": {
-            "clickToOpenCamera": "Haga clic para abrir una cámara"
+            "clickToOpenCamera": "Haga clic para abrir la cámara"
         }
client/data/blocks_types.json (1)

146-154: Consider using heroicons for consistency.

The barcode block implementation looks good and follows the established pattern. However, it uses a Material Symbols icon (i-material-symbols-barcode-scanner-rounded) while all other blocks use Heroicons. Consider using a similar icon from the Heroicons library to maintain consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2366f95 and e555e4e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • client/package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (34)
  • client/components/forms/BarcodeInput.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/DateInput.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue (3 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/RichTextAreaInput.client.vue (7 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/components/CameraUpload.vue (5 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (9 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (4 hunks)
  • client/data/blocks_types.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/ar.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/bn.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/de.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/en.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/es.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/fr.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/hi.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/ja.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/jv.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/ko.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/mr.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/pa.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/pt.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/ru.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/ta.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/te.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/tr.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/ur.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/vi.json (1 hunks)
  • client/i18n/lang/zh.json (1 hunks)
  • client/lib/forms/themes/form-themes.js (15 hunks)
  • client/package.json (1 hunks)
  • client/tailwind.config.js (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (90)
client/components/forms/RichTextAreaInput.client.vue (7)

2-5: Confirm the naming or usage of the not-draggable class
It's unclear if the not-draggable class is part of the global styling or if there's custom logic that depends on it. Verify that this class effectively prevents user drag interactions and doesn't introduce unexpected side effects.


16-16: Check focus styling for disabled or errored states
Combining focus-within classes with conditionals for disabled and error states is correct, but ensure there's no unintended overlap where user interactions are restricted or partially active.


59-59: Ensure editorOptions are consistent with Quill expectations
Because these options can be deeply nested, ensure that merging them doesn't inadvertently override crucial Quill defaults. If you anticipate multiple nested config changes, consider a more robust deep merge strategy.


75-75: Verify the necessity of defining only update:modelValue
Vue’s v-model usage typically relies on update:modelValue. Confirm whether you need additional emit events (e.g., focus, blur) to handle other lifecycle interactions with the text editor.


127-127: Maintain consistent border styling
Removing border sides in .ql-toolbar can conflict with certain design systems. Confirm that other input components or toolbars maintain a consistent style.


159-159: No issues identified
Removing or resetting the top padding for .ql-mention effectively aligns mention elements.


167-167: Confirm the appended “@” content does not conflict with i18n
.ql-mention::after appends an “@” symbol. If this symbol is used differently or in a localized context, consider extracting it or confirming it’s globally correct.

client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (23)

16-16: Ensure correct focus style when disabled is false
This updated class binding correctly avoids applying the focus ring when disabled is true, enhancing accessibility and preventing accidental visual feedback for disabled inputs.


38-39: Maintain consistent spacing and layout
Adding theme.SelectInput.minHeight and explicit ltr:pr-8 rtl:pl-8 ensures a uniform minimum height and proper horizontal spacing for both left-to-right and right-to-left layouts. Good job handling RTL cases here.


80-87: Use of negative z-index
Using -z-[1] on this element may cause issues in certain stacking contexts, particularly if parent elements establish new stacking contexts. Confirm that it behaves properly across all browsers and container contexts.

If you'd like help verifying or a code snippet demonstrating an alternative approach, let me know.


89-89: Chevron icon pointer-events
The icon is wrapped in a container marked with pointer-events: none. This is good for preventing accidental clicks on the chevron while still giving a visual cue. No concerns here.


95-95: Correct conditional logic for clear button
Hiding the clear button if disabled or the input is empty aligns well with expected UX, preventing unnecessary or non-functional interactions.


217-217: Efficient theme management
The import from CachedDefaultTheme.js is a solid approach to ensuring theme data is cached and quickly retrieved.


225-239: Allowing Boolean in modelValue
Expanding the modelValue prop's type to include Boolean can be beneficial but also raises a question about the semantic meaning of a true/false value in a select context. Verify that user code and the template handle boolean states as intended, especially in multi-select mode.


244-244: Injecting theme
By injecting and returning the theme if available, you ensure local theme overrides or global defaults are consistently respected. This is a neat approach to theming.


251-252: New disabled prop
The addition of a disabled prop is well integrated and consistently checked throughout the component. Great job keeping the UI accessible.


264-264: Simplified color handling
Defining --bg-form-color in optionStyle is a clean approach to theming, ensuring uniform styling across option elements.


269-269: Focus ring color
Using --tw-ring-color ensures that the ring color remains consistent with the rest of the form theme. Nicely done.


280-280: Short-circuit return for filtered data
Early return statements keep the code simpler and more readable.


295-295: Clear naming
isSearchable clarifies the conditions under which the user can type or create new options. Straightforward and readable.


298-298: Detecting emptiness
Good separation of concerns using isEmpty to handle both single and multiple selection states.


303-303: Search term watcher
The watch logic for searchTerm is concise. Ensure that clearing the search field doesn't conflict with other watchers or states if you expand functionality later.


311-311: Prevent closing while interacting
The onClickAway guard is short and effective, preventing accidental closure when clicking within the dropdown.


317-317: Robust selection check
isSelected(value) gracefully handles single, multiple, or keyed selection. Nicely done.


330-330: Focus lock
Conditionally preventing focus logic if disabled ensures a consistent disabled experience.


336-336: Blur logic
Likewise, skipping blur events for disabled fields prevents undesired transitions or events.


341-341: Dropdown toggling
This method provides a straightforward approach to toggling the dropdown with built-in checks for disabled and focus states.


356-356: Selectable logic
Ensuring unique behaviors for multiple vs. single select scenarios keeps the method cohesive. Good job.


391-391: Clear method
Resetting modelValue to either an empty array or null is an intuitive approach to clearing state.


394-394: Option creation
Creating custom options dynamically can enhance user experience. Just confirm you handle duplicates if a user types an existing option.

client/components/forms/components/CameraUpload.vue (7)

24-24: Validate toggling of 'processCapturedImage'.
When isBarcodeMode is false, the capture image button is displayed. This makes sense if capturing images is unnecessary for barcode scans. Consider providing user feedback if users attempt to capture an image in barcode mode.


116-119: Depend on 'isBarcodeMode' carefully.
The prop isBarcodeMode is straightforward for toggling scanning. Ensure that your system gracefully returns to normal image capture mode when barcode scanning is off.


120-123: Flexible decoders for extended barcode support.
Allowing an array of decoders makes the component adaptable to different barcode formats.


125-125: Emits now include 'barcodeDetected'.
The addition of 'barcodeDetected' clarifies event-driven interactions. Ensure parent components implement an appropriate event handler.


156-158: Conditional Quagga initialization.
Starting Quagga only in barcode mode is concise. If the user toggles isBarcodeMode mid-session, evaluate whether you need an additional tear-down or re-init.


205-208: Graceful Quagga shutdown.
Calling Quagga.stop() on cancel helps prevent resource leaks. This logic is essential to free the camera stream.


102-102: Confirm 'quagga' library availability.
Ensure that "quagga" is appropriately declared in your dependencies and that you are on a compatible version.

✅ Verification successful

quagga dependency is properly declared

The quagga library is correctly declared in the client's package.json dependencies with version "^0.12.1". This confirms that the library is available for use in the CameraUpload.vue component.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify 'quagga' is listed in package.json:
rg '"quagga"' -A 3 package.json

Length of output: 86


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Try to find package.json files in the repository
fd package.json

# After finding the correct package.json, let's check its content for quagga
fd package.json --exec cat {}

Length of output: 3131

client/tailwind.config.js (2)

59-59: New custom shadow style.
The 'custom-shadow' entry follows typical Tailwind naming patterns. Confirm it aligns with the overall design language.


79-80: Additional 'notion-input' border colors.
border and borderDark improve theming. Verify these new colors meet accessibility contrast guidelines.

client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue (2)

7-11: Adoption of theme-based classes.
Including theme.default.borderRadius and theme.MatrixInput.cell/table fosters consistency across UI elements.


24-25: Improved internationalization support.
Using ltr:border-l and rtl:border-r ensures correct border placement for RTL layouts.

client/components/forms/BarcodeInput.vue (3)

1-37: Dedicated BarcodeInput template.
Your conditional <CameraUpload> block and scanning state usage look clean. Confirm camera permission edge cases are addressed.


39-94: Conditional rendering for scanned values.
The UI cleanly displays a scanned barcode or prompts user action if scanning is inactive. Good separation of states.


102-117: Adding decoders prop for flexible barcode formats.
Great approach to passing possible decoder types into the component. This enhances interoperability for different barcode standards.

client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (1)

15-15: Refined naming for the simple theme.
Renaming it “Simple (no shadows)” gives users a clearer expectation of its styling.

client/components/forms/DateInput.vue (2)

62-62: Consider confirming that panel closure and lifecycle hooks still work.

You replaced the destructured close parameter with a direct template usage. If any logic depended on calling close() manually, ensure that listeners or watchers inside <DatePicker> or <UPopover> properly close the panel and handle other side effects.


162-164: Great conditional styling for focus/active state.

When the component isn't disabled, has no errors, and the picker is open, it shows a clear visual cue with a ring effect. This improves the user’s focus feedback. No issues found with this logic.

client/components/forms/FileInput.vue (1)

26-26: Good addition of a disabled-state style.

Adding !bg-gray-200 dark:!bg-gray-800 provides a clear visual cue when the input is disabled. This improves accessibility by indicating that the control is unavailable.

client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue (2)

226-227: New field type mapped successfully.

matrix: 'MatrixInput' and barcode: 'BarcodeInput' have been added. This is a straightforward addition to expand available field components. Just ensure you’ve included any necessary fallback handling if these components are not imported or if data is missing.


342-345: Barcode decoder assignment.

Properties for the barcode field are correctly assigned from field.decoders. Verify that any empty or invalid decoders do not cause runtime errors in BarcodeInput.

client/lib/forms/themes/form-themes.js (19)

4-4: Exporting themes object.

The export scaffold is correct; no issues at a glance. Keep an eye on potential scoping or bundling constraints to ensure everything is properly recognized.


12-12: Label styling updated to font-semibold.

This change can strengthen the visual emphasis on labels. Confirm it aligns with the rest of your design system.


69-90: Introducing PhoneInput theming.

You’ve added a specialized styling block for phone input. Verify the flag and flagSize classes don’t conflict with default styling in different screen sizes or when flags are loaded dynamically.


92-92: FlatSelectInput: replaced spacing with gap-x-2.

Revising from space-x-* to gap-x-* is beneficial in newer Tailwind. Confirm that all target browsers handle the gap property correctly.


157-160: MatrixInput styling.

The introduced classes (table, cell, cellHover) support structured data entry. Be sure the hover effect doesn’t conflict with any global usage in dark mode.


216-218: Duplicating “SelectInput” changes in the simple theme.

Keep your theming consistent with the default version. Looks correct; just confirm it’s stable in all color modes.


249-256: Maintaining gap/space differences.

For “FlatSelectInput” in the simple theme, you retained space-x-2. Confirm that it’s intentionally different from the default theme or unify if needed.


308-312: MatrixInput added to simple theme.

Provides a consistent approach for both default and simple themes. Validate that coloring, spacing, and hover states match your design guidelines.


324-324: Rounded border for notion theme inputs.

Check that it aligns with your brand guidelines or previously established design pattern in “notion” styling.


350-350: ScaleInput styling in notion theme.

Adding border classes for consistent boundaries is fine. Validate that user focus states also get the ring effect.


357-357: Button styling in notion theme.

Ensuring consistent border usage with dark:border-notion-input-borderDark is good. Check for color conflicts with backgrounds.


360-360: CodeInput border usage.

Ensures a consistent boundary matching the rest of the notion theme. Make sure code blocks remain scrollable if content overflows.


364-364: RichTextAreaInput border usage.

In line with the other notion input changes. Test for multiline editing or advanced formatting cases in this border style.


401-409: FlatSelectInput hover style using backdrop-brightness-95.

Double-check that this filter doesn’t produce undesirable color mixing in certain conditions, especially layered backgrounds.


411-411: Adjusted border classes for DateInput in notion theme.

Aligns with the rest of the notion input changes. Ensure date popover styling is similarly updated (if needed).


431-435: SwitchInput “translatedClass” usage.

Ensure these translation distances align with your handle size. Double-check that toggling doesn’t clip or overshoot visually.


446-446: FileInput border enhancements.

Applying dashed notion input borders. Confirm the dashed style visually communicates the droppable area to users.
[approve]


457-457: UploadedFile border usage.

Good for consistent notion theme. No immediate concerns.


465-469: MatrixInput for notion theme.

Mirrors the changes in other themes. Confirm that the hover effect hover:backdrop-brightness-95 suits the app’s look without unexpected brightness on certain backgrounds.

client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue (1)

234-234: Label update looks good.
Renaming "End date" to "Include end date" more accurately conveys the functionality. No issues here.

client/i18n/lang/zh.json (1)

39-41: Consistent addition of barcode input localization.
The new key clickToOpenCamera aligns with the introduced barcode scanning functionality. Good job maintaining consistent translations.

client/i18n/lang/ko.json (1)

39-41: Adequate localization for barcode scanning.
The key clickToOpenCamera is properly translated to Korean. This will improve usability for KO users.

client/i18n/lang/ja.json (1)

39-41: Clear Japanese prompt for camera use.
The clickToOpenCamera addition is correct. Including the clear key under signatureInput is also consistent. Nicely done.

client/i18n/lang/ar.json (1)

39-41: LGTM! Arabic translation properly handles RTL text.

The Arabic translation for the barcode camera prompt is grammatically correct and properly formatted for right-to-left (RTL) text display. The structure follows the established pattern for input-specific sections.

client/i18n/lang/vi.json (1)

39-41: Verify translations for all supported languages.

The barcode scanning translations have been added to Arabic, English, and Vietnamese. Please ensure all other supported languages in the i18n directory also receive appropriate translations for this feature.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the actual content of the translations to verify if they are consistent across all language files.


Barcode scanning translations are complete in all supported languages

The verification shows that the barcode scanning feature's translations are properly implemented across all language files in the i18n directory. Each language file contains the "barcodeInput" section with appropriate translations for "clickToOpenCamera" in their respective languages, maintaining consistent JSON structure and semantic equivalence.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# List all language files and check for missing barcode translations
echo "Language files missing barcode translations:"
for lang_file in client/i18n/lang/*.json; do
  if ! grep -q '"barcodeInput"' "$lang_file"; then
    echo "- $lang_file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 1998


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Show barcodeInput translations from all language files
for lang_file in client/i18n/lang/*.json; do
  echo "=== $(basename "$lang_file") ==="
  rg -A 1 '"barcodeInput"' "$lang_file" || echo "No barcodeInput translation found"
done

Length of output: 5184

client/i18n/lang/pa.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Translation is accurate and consistent.

The Punjabi translation for the barcode camera prompt maintains consistency with existing camera-related translations and follows proper grammatical structure.

client/i18n/lang/ur.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! RTL formatting and translation are correct.

The Urdu translation maintains proper right-to-left formatting and follows consistent terminology with existing camera-related translations.

client/i18n/lang/bn.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Translation is accurate and consistent.

The Bengali translation for the barcode camera prompt maintains consistency with existing camera-related translations and follows proper grammatical structure.

client/i18n/lang/tr.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Translation is clear and well-structured.

The Turkish translation for the barcode camera prompt is grammatically correct and maintains consistency with the existing UI language style.

client/i18n/lang/hi.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Hindi translation is accurate and natural.

The Hindi translation maintains proper grammar and follows a natural language flow that will be easily understood by Hindi-speaking users.

client/i18n/lang/mr.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Marathi translation is accurate and well-integrated.

The Marathi translation is grammatically correct and maintains consistency with the existing UI language style.

client/i18n/lang/ru.json (1)

40-42: Russian translation looks good!

The translation is accurate and maintains a natural flow in Russian.

client/i18n/lang/pt.json (2)

40-42: Portuguese translation looks good!

The translation is accurate and maintains a natural flow in Portuguese.


40-42: Verify translation consistency across all language files

Let's ensure all language files have the new "barcodeInput" section with appropriate translations.

✅ Verification successful

Translation consistency verified across all language files

The verification shows that all language files (20 in total) have the "barcodeInput" section with the "clickToOpenCamera" key properly translated into their respective languages. Each language file contains appropriate translations that convey the same meaning "Click to open a camera" in different languages, including:

  • English: "Click to open a camera"
  • Arabic: "انقر لفتح كاميرا"
  • French: "Cliquez pour ouvrir une caméra"
  • Chinese: "点击打开相机"
  • And many others...
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistency of barcodeInput translations across all language files

echo "Checking for barcodeInput translations in all language files..."
for lang_file in $(fd -e json . client/i18n/lang/); do
  echo "=== $lang_file ==="
  # Check if barcodeInput section exists
  jq -r '.forms.barcodeInput // "MISSING barcodeInput section"' "$lang_file"
  # Check if clickToOpenCamera key exists
  jq -r '.forms.barcodeInput.clickToOpenCamera // "MISSING clickToOpenCamera key"' "$lang_file"
done

Length of output: 8260

client/i18n/lang/te.json (1)

40-42: LGTM! Translation is accurate and natural.

The Telugu translation is grammatically correct and follows natural language patterns. It maintains consistency with the formal tone used throughout the interface.

client/i18n/lang/ta.json (1)

40-42: LGTM! Translation is accurate and consistent.

The Tamil translation is grammatically correct and maintains consistency with the formal tone used throughout the interface. Since this is part of a new barcode scanning feature, let's verify the integration.

Let's verify if all required translations are present across localization files:

✅ Verification successful

Translation integration is complete across all locales

The verification shows that the barcodeInput.clickToOpenCamera translation key is properly present in all locale files (ar, bn, de, en, es, fr, hi, ja, jv, ko, mr, pa, pt, ru, ta, te, tr, ur, vi, zh). The successful jq queries (exit code 0) for each locale file confirm that the translation structure is consistent across all supported languages.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if barcodeInput translations are consistently present across all locale files
# Expected: All locale files should have the barcodeInput.clickToOpenCamera key

echo "Checking for barcodeInput translations across locale files..."
for locale_file in $(fd -e json . client/i18n/lang/); do
  echo "Checking $locale_file..."
  jq -e '.forms.barcodeInput.clickToOpenCamera' "$locale_file" > /dev/null 2>&1
  if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
    echo "WARNING: Missing barcodeInput translation in $locale_file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 4706

client/i18n/lang/de.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Clear and grammatically correct German translation.

The translation "Klicken Sie, um eine Kamera zu öffnen" is well-structured and follows German grammar rules. The placement within the forms section maintains consistency with other form components.

client/i18n/lang/fr.json (1)

40-41: LGTM! Clear and grammatically correct French translation.

The translation "Cliquez pour ouvrir une caméra" is well-structured and follows French grammar rules. The placement within the forms section maintains consistency with other form components.

client/package.json (1)

65-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using a more modern barcode scanning library.

The Quagga library (v0.12.1) hasn't been updated since 2016 and may have security vulnerabilities or compatibility issues. Consider using more modern alternatives:

  1. @zxing/library:

    • Actively maintained
    • TypeScript support
    • Better performance
    • Broader format support
  2. html5-qrcode:

    • Modern implementation
    • Active development
    • Better documentation
    • Enhanced features

Let's check for known vulnerabilities:

client/data/blocks_types.json (1)

149-149: Verify the Material Symbols icon dependency.

Ensure that the Material Symbols icon library is properly included in the project's dependencies since this is the first usage of an icon from this library.

Run the following script to check for the Material Symbols dependency:

✅ Verification successful

Material Symbols icon library is properly included and used in the project

The verification shows that the Material Symbols icon library is correctly set up in the project:

  • The @iconify-json/material-symbols package is included in the dependencies (version ^1.2.4)
  • Multiple files in the codebase are already using Material Symbols icons, including:
    • Various Vue components under client/components/
    • JSON configuration files like blocks_types.json and integrations.json
    • Store files like working_form.js

This indicates that the icon library is properly integrated and actively used throughout the project, making it safe to use the i-material-symbols-barcode-scanner-rounded icon.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for Material Symbols icon library dependency

# Check package.json for Material Symbols dependency
echo "Checking package.json for Material Symbols dependency..."
fd -t f "package.json" -x cat {} \; | jq '.dependencies + .devDependencies' | grep -i "material-symbols"

# Check for any Material Symbols imports in the codebase
echo "Checking for Material Symbols imports..."
rg -l "material-symbols"

# Check if the icon is defined in any CSS/SCSS files
echo "Checking for icon definition in stylesheets..."
fd -e css -e scss -x rg -l "material-symbols" {}

Length of output: 1025

@@ -91,6 +97,7 @@ const quillOptions = computed(() => {
]
}
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Deeply merge Quill modules for reliability
Merging only the first level of modules objects can lead to unexpected overwrites. If props.editorOptions.modules contains multiple nested objects (e.g., syntax, clipboard), consider a deep merge to avoid losing default sub-options.


export default {
name: "FileInput",
name: "CameraUpload",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

References to 'FileInput' still exist in the codebase and need attention

The component name change from 'FileInput' to 'CameraUpload' requires updates in several files where 'FileInput' is still referenced:

  • client/components/forms/FileInput.vue: Component is still named 'FileInput'
  • client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue: Contains multiple references to 'FileInput' in component mapping
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/ColumnCondition.vue: Contains reference to 'FileInput' in component mapping

These references need to be updated to maintain consistency with the new component name.

🔗 Analysis chain

Renaming from 'FileInput' to 'CameraUpload'.
The name change reflects the new scanning functionality. Confirm that no references to “FileInput” remain in the codebase.


Let me verify if there are any imports of 'FileInput' in the codebase.


Let me check the actual usage of FileInput component in the templates.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
rg 'FileInput' -A 2

Length of output: 1063


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for FileInput imports
rg "import.*FileInput" -g "*.{vue,js,ts}"

Length of output: 43


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for FileInput in template sections
rg "<FileInput" -g "*.vue" -A 2

Length of output: 33

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 75f82b3 into main Jan 3, 2025
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the refactor-form-components branch January 3, 2025 15:15
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants