Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #2168 from vahid-ahmadi/vat-school-comparison-post
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
VAT private school comparison post
  • Loading branch information
vahid-ahmadi authored Oct 31, 2024
2 parents 0c5798d + c4aac71 commit 639b884
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 45 additions and 1 deletion.
Binary file added src/images/posts/vat-school-comparison-post.jpg
Loading
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
35 changes: 35 additions & 0 deletions src/posts/articles/vat-school-comparison.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
[_See the full impact on PolicyEngine here._](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=policyOutput.inequalityImpact&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2025&baseline=1)

The Autumn Budget 2024 confirms the previously signalled intention to levy VAT on private school fees. Using PolicyEngine's open-source model, we analyse the fiscal and distributional implications of this reform.

## Budgetary impacts

We project the private school VAT reform will raise [£1.5 to £1.6 billion](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=policyOutput.inequalityImpact&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2025&baseline=1) per year, totalling £7.7 billion from 2025 to 2029\.

Projections from [HM Treasury](https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6721d2c54da1c0d41942a8d2/Policy_Costing_Document_-_Autumn_Budget_2024.pdf#page=34) and the [OBR](https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/OBR_Economic_and_fiscal_outlook_Oct_2024.pdf#page=66) each total £8.6 billion, 12% higher than ours, as shown below.

#### Revenue from private school VAT by scorekeeper (£ billions)

| Fiscal Year | 2024-25 | 2025-26 | 2026-27 | 2027-28 | 2028-29 | 2029-30 | Total |
| :----------- | :------ | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | :------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | :---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :---- |
| PolicyEngine | 0.0 | [1.5](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=policyOutput.inequalityImpact&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2025&baseline=1) | [1.5](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=policyOutput.inequalityImpact&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2026&baseline=1) | [1.5](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=gov&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2027&baseline=1) | [1.6](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=policyOutput.policyBreakdown&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2028&baseline=1) | [1.6](https://policyengine.org/uk/policy?focus=policyOutput.policyBreakdown&reform=60649&region=uk&timePeriod=2029&baseline=1) | 7.7 |
| HM Treasury | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 8.6 |
| OBR | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 8.6 |

The variations between our estimates and official projections may stem from different assumptions about the total value of private school fees or varying projections of future enrollment patterns.

The OBR and HM Treasury both estimate the impact of introducing VAT on private school fees but differ in key assumptions. The OBR assumes an effective VAT rate of 15.4%, factoring in cost recoveries, with two-thirds of the cost passed to parents as higher fees, nearly a quarter absorbed by reduced services, and the rest through efficiencies. They use a demand elasticity of 0.5, predicting that around 35,000 fewer pupils will attend private schools, mostly due to fewer new joiners. In contrast, HM Treasury applies the full standard rate of 20%, calculating the tax base by multiplying pupil numbers by average fees and projecting this over time based on earnings growth. Our analysis assumes no behavioural responses and focuses only on the direct cost impact of VAT, using a static calculation without adjustments over time.

### Distributional Impact

This reform disproportionately affects households in the upper income deciles, reducing the net income of the top decile by 0.15% on average.

![](/images/posts/school_vat/income.png)

The policy would decrease net income for 3% of the population, with effects concentrated in higher income deciles.

![](/images/posts/school_vat/winner-loser.png)

When analysing impacts by wealth rather than income, this reform contributes to the pattern where all wealth deciles see lower net income, though with notably larger effects on wealthier households who are more likely to use private education[^1].

[^1]: [Recent studies](https://francisgreenspersonalwebpage.com/2021/02/11/income-housing-and-private-school-access-in-britain/) show that private school attendance is concentrated among wealthier households in the UK.
11 changes: 10 additions & 1 deletion src/posts/posts.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -836,10 +836,19 @@
"filename": "school-vat.md",
"image": "classroom-2093744.jpg"
},
{
"title": "Levying VAT on private school fees in the Autumn Budget",
"description": "PolicyEngine projects the reforms to private school VAT would raise £1.5 billion in 2025.",
"date": "2024-10-31 15:00:00",
"tags": ["uk", "tax", "policy", "vat", "featured"],
"authors": ["vahid-ahmadi"],
"filename": "vat-school-comparison.md",
"image": "vat-school-comparison-post.jpg"
},
{
"title": "Benefits uprating 2025/26",
"description": "PolicyEngine projects Labour's 1.7% benefits uprating would cost £2.5 billion, mainly benefiting lower-income households.",
"date": "2024-10-31 01:00:00",
"date": "2024-10-31 15:00:00",
"tags": ["uk", "benefit", "inflation"],
"authors": ["vahid-ahmadi"],
"filename": "Benefit-uprating-25.md",
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 639b884

Please sign in to comment.