DRAFT: Add ruff rules datetimez (DTZ)

[cclauss]

Description

Please include:

• relevant motivation
• a summary of the change
• which issue is fixed.
• any additional dependencies that are required for this change.

Closes: # (issue)
Let's try to limit the use of naive datetimes.

% ruff --select=DTZ --statistics

40	DTZ001	The use of `datetime.datetime()` without `tzinfo` argument is not allowed
 4	DTZ005	The use of `datetime.datetime.now()` without `tz` argument is not allowed
 2	DTZ006	The use of `datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp()` without `tz` argument is not allowed
 1	DTZ002	The use of `datetime.datetime.today()` is not allowed, use `datetime.datetime.now(tz=)` instead
 1	DTZ003	The use of `datetime.datetime.utcnow()` is not allowed, use `datetime.datetime.now(tz=)` instead

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 2 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (4074baf) 80.97% compared to head (a73cb50) 80.97%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/whoosh/qparser/dateparse.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/whoosh/util/times.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #60   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.97%   80.97%           
=======================================
  Files         133      133           
  Lines       29496    29496           
  Branches     5066     5066           
=======================================
  Hits        23884    23884           
  Misses       4737     4737           
  Partials      875      875           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1 Security Hotspot

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[ZeroCool940711]

Looks really good, should I merge it or is it still a WIP?

[cclauss]

Merge. I will try to keep PRs in draft mode until they are ready for review.

[cclauss]

We can fix the SonarCloud issue when we add ruff rules B.

[ZeroCool940711]

Merge. I will try to keep PRs in draft mode until they are ready for review.

Understood. I guess what confused me was the title since it says DRAFT in it, I didn't notice you already made it ready for review and was no longer a draft 😄

[cclauss]

My mistake. I should have updated the title. Thx.